Monday, March 31, 2008

Race & The Social Contract

We're not the only people in the world grappling with the issues of race. I thought this article has some resonance at home too.

Editorial Observer

Race and the Social Contract
by Eduardo Porter, The New York Times

Published: March 31, 2008


In 1893, Friedrich Engels wrote from London to Friedrich Adolph Sorge, another German Communist then living in New York, lamenting how America’s diversity hindered efforts to establish a workers’ party in the United States. Was it possible to unify Poles, Germans, Irish, “the many small groups, each of which understands only itself”? All the bourgeoisie had to do was wait, “and the dissimilar elements of the working class fall apart again.”

America’s mix of peoples has changed in its 200-plus years. Yet when Barack Obama delivered his bracing speech on race, he was grappling with a similar challenge. “Realize that your dreams do not have to come at the expense of my dreams,” he said. “Investing in the health, welfare and education of black and brown and white children will ultimately help all of America prosper.”

It is a tall order. Ten years ago, William Julius Wilson wrote that American whites rebelled against welfare because they saw it as using their hard-earned taxes to give blacks “medical and legal services that many of them could not afford for their own families.”

As obviously sensible as Mr. Obama’s proposition might be in a nation of as many hues, tongues and creeds as the United States, it struggles against self-defeating human behavior: racial and ethnic diversity undermine support for public investment in social welfare. For all the appeal of America’s melting pot, the country’s diverse ethnic mix is one main reason for entrenched opposition to public spending on the public good.

Among the 30 nations in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, a club of industrial countries, only Mexicans, Koreans and Greeks pay less in taxes than Americans, as a share of the economy. The United States also ranks near the bottom on public spending on social programs: 19 percent of the nation’s total output in 2003, compared with 29 percent in Sweden, 23 percent in Portugal and almost 30 percent in France.

The Harvard economists Alberto Alesina and Edward Glaeser correlated public spending in Western Europe and the United States with diversity and concluded that half the social-spending gap was due to the United States’ more varied racial and ethnic mix. The other half was mostly due to the existence of stronger left-wing parties in Europe.

Americans are not less generous than Europeans. When private charities are included, they probably spend more money for social purposes than Europeans do. But philanthropy allows them to target spending on those they personally believe are deserving, instead of allowing the government to choose.

Mr. Glaeser’s and Mr. Alesina’s work suggests that white Europeans support a big welfare state because they believe the money will probably go to other white Europeans. In America, the Harvard economist Erzo F. P. Luttmer found that support for social spending among respondents to General Social Survey polls increased in tandem with the share of welfare recipients in the area who were in their own racial group. A study of charity by Daniel Hungerman, a Notre Dame economist, found that all-white congregations become less charitably active as the share of black residents in the local community grows.

This breakdown of solidarity should be unacceptable in a country that is, after all, mainly a nation of immigrants, glued together by a common project and many shared values. The United States has showed an unparalleled capacity to pull together in challenging times. Americans have invested blood and treasure to serve a broad national purpose and to rescue and protect their allies across the Atlantic.

Still, racial and ethnic antagonism all too frequently limit generosity at home. In one study, Mr. Alesina, with Reza Baqir of the International Monetary Fund and William Easterly of New York University, found that the share of municipal spending in the United States devoted to social good — roads, sewage, education and trash clearance— was smaller in more racially diverse cities.

While this tension manifests mainly along racial lines, it has broader ethnic, religious and even linguistic dimensions. A 2003 study by Julian Betts of the University of California, San Diego, and Robert Fairlie of the University of California, Santa Cruz, found that for every four immigrants who arrived in public high schools, one native student switched to a private school.

Politicians, from Richard Nixon to Tom Tancredo, have long exploited racial tensions. But there is nothing inevitable about ethnic animosities, as Senator Obama argued in his speech, which came at an important moment.

Globalization presents the United States with an enormous challenge. Rising to the test will require big investments in the public good — from infrastructure to education to a safety net protecting those most vulnerable to change. Americans must once again show their ability to transcend group interests for a common national cause.

Saturday, March 29, 2008

That Was A Short Honeymoon...

Looks like the Selangor state government has already run afoul of various NGOs and human rights organisations:

Saturday March 29, 2008

Forced evictions not the way: Bar Council


PETALING JAYA: The new Selangor state government should abandon the zero-squatter policy practised by the previous state administration, said the Bar Council.

Bar Council president Ambiga Sreenevasan said the policy was "flawed and an unmitigated disaster from the high-handed manner in which the forced evictions were carried out".

In a statement, she said the Bar Council was concerned with Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim's announcement that he would continue on the path embarked by his predecessor to eradicate all squatter settlements in Selangor.

"The inhumane treatment and the failure to address the basic housing needs of the poor and marginalised is of great concern.

"Rather than support such a policy, the state government should abandon it and make an open declaration that it will desist from using the draconian Essential (Clearance of Squatters) Regulations promulgated under the Emergency Ordinance," she said.

Ambiga added that a policy on urban resettlement should include room for negotiations and the willingness to give these settlers affordable and decent alternative housing.

On another matter, the Bar Council also voiced their concerns about Khalid's proposal to impose an additioanal levy on foreign workers, which would be paid by the employers.

"Such a levy would almost certainly be transferred to the worker by his employer," said Ambiga.

She also said it was wrong to perceive that a reduction in foreign labour would result in lower crime and social problems.

"Statistics show that foreigners only account for 2% of the crime in the country, and while no one will discount that we have our share of social problems, it is unfair to lay the blame solely on foreign workers," she said

************************************************************************************

Saturday March 29, 2008

Think of national interests, Suaram told

BANTING: Suara Rakyat Malaysia (Suaram) should take a more national approach to foreign worker issues and not attack the state government, says Selangor Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim.

Khalid said the state government’s proposal to collect RM9 monthly from all migrant workers in the state was aimed at setting up a fund to help provide re-training for local unemployed youths so they could land better jobs. (If they're unemployed, any job would be better, no?)

He said foreign workers living and working in Selangor enjoyed all the state's infrastructure, like good schools, health facilities and roads and the state was just calling for them contribute something in return. (Foreign workers are going to good schools? They're enjoying health facilities?)

Well done: Khalid presenting a certificate to top participant Mohd Shaari Md Lazit during the closing ceremony of the training course at Pulapes in Jugra Friday. —Bernama

“Suaram feels that bringing in foreign workers is one of the solutions to human rights problems but they should understand we have to help our own people, too. (I don't think Suaram feels that foreign workers are a solution to human rights problems...)

“This is a democracy, so we can open up and discuss the matter,” he told reporters after officiating at the closing ceremony of the training for local authorities' enforcement officers at the Selangor Enforcement Training Centre (Pulapes) in Jugra here yesterday.

On Monday, Suaram executive director Yap Swee Seng hit out at the state government's proposal, calling it unjust as foreign workers received low wages and were often exploited by employers or recruitment agencies with non-payment, unjust deduction of salary, long working hours and unfair dismissals.

He added that migrant workers were barely surviving and probably in debt after paying exorbitant fees to come to work in Malaysia.

Khalid meanwhile said the RM4,000 in levy and agency charges migrant workers paid was too large a sum, and the state planned to call on the Federal Government to reduce the amount.

He also proposed that a centralised information system be set up to keep an accurate record of foreign workers in the state.

“I was among the people involved in the corporatisation of the system for foreign workers and I can show ways to keep tabs on even the illegal workers,” he said.

Khalid also said the Federal Government should not cast aside suggestions just because they came from opposition parties and should accept the good ones.

_________________________________________________________________

I don't quite see how it would be fair to charge people poorer than us for a fund that would train our people to take over their jobs.

And is 'the corporatisation of the system for foreign workers' FOMEMA? I'm also keen to know how one keeps tabs on 'even the illegal workers'. Presumably, 'keeping tabs' on illegals means allowing them to keep on working?

Wonder what Elizabeth Wong, new ADUN and formerly of Suaram, thinks of this?

Friday, March 28, 2008

Dad speaks out

To add a little frisson to your day, folks, take a look at this.

In the print edition, there is a letter by Dato Param Cumuraswamy, right after Dad's article, that pretty much takes Zaid Ibrahim to task on his recent pronouncements. But I can't find it online.

Thursday, March 27, 2008

I'm a Millionaire!!!


...well, as a blogger I mean. Today, one year and one week since I started counting*, I got my ONE MILLIONTH hit!!! Woo hoo!!

For that I have to thank all of you, friends, family, strangers, fellow bloggers, detractors, shrewd observers, passersby and everyone else who has cared to stop by this blog of mine to read what I have to say. Whether you have agreed with me or not, I thank you for the kind attention and the support. As every blogger knows, it's a great feeling to be able to voice your opinions, to have them read, and to get a response in return, good and bad. It's also that great feeling of community with your readers, especially the regular ones who I may never meet in person but whom I feel I've gotten to know over the past year and gotten fond of, despite sometimes contrary opinions.

I suppose I should also thank the cybertroopers who sometimes come in here just to scream at me and blame everyone except their own bosses. Like I keep saying, all you're doing, guys, is to up my hit counter.

Well I hope you all do keep reading and commenting. It's a brave new world we're living in these days and the Internet, including us bloggers, are an inevitable part of it.

Happy Friday and weekend!

* I actually started my blog in December 2006 but only set up my sitemeter counter on March 20 2007.

The Drama's still Unfolding...


MYT 11:17:13 AM

Umno management panel wants party elections to go on

PETALING JAYA: The Umno management committee has unanimously agreed that the party should proceed with its elections this year.

Umno vice-president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin said all members of the panel chaired by deputy president Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak were of the view that the polls should not be postponed under the pretext of reviving the party after its poor showing in the March 8 general election.

"We should have elections because the democratic process has to continue. There is nothing to be afraid of"

"We should take the bull by the horns," Muhyiddin told reporters at the Vietnam-Malaysia Economic Conference at the Sunway Lagoon Resort Thursday.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Everything is still unfolding....


Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Telling a Story from Headlines

Sometimes just reading headlines is more than enough to tell you the story. Here's a sampling of headlines from The Star today. I would call the story 'Burying One's Head in the Sand':

Pak Lah to seek audience with Agong over MB issueLatest News
Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi will seek an audience with the Yang di-Pertuan Agong Tuanku Mizan Zainal Abidin who is also Sultan of Terengganu to discuss the issue of the state Mentri Besar. (Only now seeking an audience, huh?)

Umno state committees want party elections postponed to 2009Latest News
All state liaison committees who have met with Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi over the weekend have unanimously agreed to call for the postponement of party elections until next year. (uhuh...prolonging the pain and misery, are we? And those who haven't met? )

PM unveils package to ease burden of lower-income MalaysiansLatest News
Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi has unveiled a package of measures to alleviate the burdens faced by lower income Malaysians in his second term as Prime Minister. (Bit late in the day I think...)

Reforms have not been fast enough, PM admitsLatest News
The Prime Minister has admitted he had not moved fast enough in pushing through with the reforms that he promised to undertake. (No kidding...)

Muar issue not an item at Johor Umno meeting
The issue of Muar Umno division members asking the Prime Minister to step down was not discussed in the Johor Umno liaison committee meeting held at Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi’s office in Putrajaya. (If you don't discuss it, it ain't there...)



Monday, March 24, 2008

It's Me...No, It's ME!!



My, my, what a to-do in Terengganu!

First the PM and UMNO says Idris is the MB, then the Sultan keeps delaying the swearing-in. Then the Sultan names Ahmad Said as MB, then Ahmad gets threatened with being thrown out of UMNO. Then Idris says he's got the letter of appointment, then Ahmad says HE's got it. Then PM says "That's Unconstitutional!". And Ahmad says, no, he's going to turn up for work tomorrow regardless.

Boy, sounds like a schoolyard squabble but with greater consequences.

What I don't get is, why doesn't the PM go and see the Sultan aka the Agong and talk this out? Find out why HRH can't stand Idris because he obviously has some major beef with him. Surely that's better than having this public spat and coming out looking like a fool since there's no way HRH is going to back down.

(Actually I'm really interested in what exactly HRH has against Idris... and I'm also interested to know why exactly PM and those assemblyman are adamant that it should be Idris and nobody else.)

Maybe...the answer lies in having a totally different person as MB, neither Idris nor Ahmad. One that nobody takes any offense at. Surely there is a way out of this impasse which is getting more ridiculous by the day.

(Come to think of it, why don't we all vote for the one we want? Let's not base our votes on looks though...)

As a friend of mine said, since March 8, it's been a never ending series of Drama Minggu Ini (or rather, Drama Hari Ini).

Saturday, March 22, 2008

Making Noises

Ahmad Shabery Cheek, the new Information Minister, seems to be making all the right noises. It'll certainly be good if he recognises the new media and the role it plays in shaping people's opinions. I still think that we should relook at the idea of even having a Ministry of Information; call it Ministry of Public Communications or something if we have to have it at all. The main thing is for the Minister to understand that the public does have choices when it comes to information and to simply deal with that fact in an intelligent way.

Meantime, what are we to make of this?



Rafidah not sure about Azalina’s Wanita status

KUALA LUMPUR: With Wanita Umno maintaining that the wing is not represented in the new Cabinet, the status of Tourism Minister Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said is being questioned.

Is she a member of Wanita Umno? Azalina is certain she is, but Wanita Umno chief Datuk Seri Rafidah Aziz is unsure.

Light moment: (Front row, from left:) Wanita wing deputy chief Datuk Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil and Rafidah sharing a light moment with other Wanita Umno exco members in Kuala Lumpur yesterday.
Rafidah, who was dropped from the new Cabinet line-up on Tuesday, said she had no idea which Umno branch Azalina belonged to.

“They can’t just come out from the sky. They must belong to a branch. Everyone has a branch or a division somewhere,” she told reporters after chairing a Wanita Umno exco meeting yesterday.

Azalina, the former Puteri Umno chief, countered that a Puteri member automatically became a Wanita member once she attained the Puteri age limit.

Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said
“I am the Penggerang Umno division deputy chief and as such the question of whether I am a Wanita member or not does not arise. I am an Umno member appointed as minister.

“According to the (Puteri) Constitution, Puteri members who have passed the age limit automatically become Wanita members,” she told reporters at her ministry yesterday.

The age limit for Puteri Umno chief is 40. It is 35 for other Puteri posts.

Rafidah, the former International Trade and Industry Minister, accepted that this was the case, but stressed that a Wanita member must be in a branch or division.

She said there was no need to make a stand on the issue because it was an individual matter.

“I do not jaga hal orang (am not a busybody). Individuals are not relevant. What is important is support for the party leadership,” she said.

Following the new Cabinet line-up announced by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, Wanita Umno expressed disappointment that no member from the wing had been appointed.

Azalina then said that she should be viewed as the Wanita Umno representative.
___________________________________________________________

Considering that Azalina has been Youth and Sports Minister for the past four years, it's a bit funny that the question of which UMNO branch she belongs to should suddenly arise now. Doesn't she go to Wanita meetings? Shouldn't the Wanita head know exactly which branches each of the Wanita members holding office come from?Oh dear, oh dear, ladies, now is not the time to start quibbling over these things, no?

Better check now which branch Noraini Ahmad, current head of Puteri, is from. She's already Deputy Minister of Human Resources, and she's not too far from turning 40 too. We wouldn't want to find yet another is-she-isn't-she situation later, would we?

_____





Tuesday, March 18, 2008

The New (and Not-So-New) Bigwigs


UPDATE: Dato Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil has been appointed Special
Advisor(with Ministerial status) to the PM on women and
social development affairs.Now what does THAT mean?
Where does that leave Yen Yen then?

The PM also seems unaware that there is a Majlis Penasihat Wanita
(formerly known as the National Advisory Council for the Integration
of Women in Development (NACIWID)) which comprises of women
appointed by the Government to advise it on women's issues. It used
to be an independent body until a few years ago when Shahrizat
decided to chair it herself. If you've never heard of it, that's
understandable as it really doesn't get to do much advising and
whatever advice it does give tends to not get heeded much.
I've been a member of it for some years and have always been
frustrated by its redundancy. Guess now it'll be even
more redundant.

With Shahrizat's appointment, there are now 33 Ministers
(excluding PM and DPM),one more than before.


ORIGINAL POST:
Full list of 2008 cabinet
Mar 18, 08 1:02pm

The following is the list of cabinet ministers and their deputies as

announced by the prime minister at 12 noon today.

Prime Minister

Abdullah Ahmad Badawi (Umno)

Deputy Prime Minister
Najib Razak (Umno)

Finance Minister
Abdullah Ahmad Badawi (Umno)

Second Finance Minister
Nor Mohamed Yakcop (Umno)

Deputies: Ahmad Husni Hanadzlah (Umno), Kong Cho Ha (MCA)

Defence Minister
Najib Razak (Umno)

Deputy: Abu Seman Yusop (Umno)

Housing and Local Government Minister
Ong Ka Chuan (MCA)

Deputy: Robert Lau Hoi Chew (Supp), Hamzah Zainuddin (Umno)


Works Minister

Mohd Zin Mohamed (Umno)

Deputy: Yong Khoon Seng (Supp)

Energy, Water and Communications Minister

Shaziman Abu Mansor (Umno) (Communications, huh?
This was the guy who said this
.)

Deputy: Joseph Salang Gandum

Agriculture and Agro-Based Industry Minister
Mustapa Mohamed (Umno)

Deputy: Rohani Abdul Karim (Umno)

International Trade and Industry Minister
Muhyiddin Yassin (Umno)

Deputy: Leow Wui Keong (LDP), Jacob Dungau Sagan

Foreign Minister
Rais Yatim (Umno)

Deputy: Tengku Azlan Sultan Abu Bakar (Umno)

Education Minister
Hishammuddin Hussein (Umno)

Deputies: Dr Wee Ka Siong (MCA), Razali Ismail (Umno)

Transport Minister
Ong Tee Keat (MCA)

Deputy: Anifah Aman

Health Minister

Liow Tiong Lai (MCA)

Deputy: Dr Abdul Latiff Ahmad (Umno)

Human Resources Minister
S Subramaniam (MIC)

Deputy: Noraini Ahmad (Umno)

Home Affairs and Internal Security Minister
Syed Hamid Albar (Umno)

Deputies: Chor Chee Heung (MCA), Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh (Umno)

Women, Family and Community Development Minister

Dr Ng Yen Yen (MCA)

Deputy: Noriah Kasmon (Umno)

National Unity, Culture, Arts and Heritage Minister
Shafie Apdal (Umno)

Deputy: Teng Boon Soon (MCA)

Science, Technology and Innovation Minister
Dr Maximus Ongkili (PBS)

Deputy: Fadillah Yusof

Entrepreneurial and Cooperative Development Minister
Noh Omar (Umno) (the guy who did so well
when we had Squatgate...)


Deputy: Saifudin Abdullah

Higher Education Minister
Mohd Khaled Nordin (Umno)

Deputies: Idris Haron (Umno), Dr Hou Kok Chung (MCA)

Information Minister
Ahmad Shabery Cheek (Umno)
(and this is the new Zam...)

Deputy: Tan Lian Hoe (Gerakan)

Natural Resources and Environment Minister
Douglas Uggah Embas (PBB)

Deputy: Abdul Ghapur Salleh (Umno)

Rural and Regional Development Minister
Senator Muhammad Muhammad Taib (Umno)
(Need I say anything?)

Deputies: Joseph Kurup, Joseph Entulu Belaun

Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs Minister
Shahrir Abdul Samad (Umno)

Deputy: Jelaing Mersat

Plantation Industries and Commodities Minister
Peter Chin Fah Kui (Supp)

Deputy: Kohilan Pillay (Gerakan)

Youth and Sports Minister
Ismail Sabri Yaakob (Umno) (and this one loves
youth-oriented activities like blogging...not!)


Deputy: Wee Jeck Seng (MCA)

Tourism Minister
Azalina Othman Said (Umno)

Deputy: Sulaiman Abdul Rahman Abdul Taib (PBB)

Federal Territories Minister
Zulhasnan Rafique (Umno)

Deputy: M Saravanan (MIC)

Minister in the Prime Minister's Department

Zaid Ibrahim (Umno, to be appointed senator) - in charge of legal affairs
(Good...!)

Zahid Hamidi (Umno)
Bernard Dompok (Upko)
Mohamed Nazri Abdul Aziz (Umno) (still there huh?)
Amirsham A Aziz (former Maybank CEO, to be appointed senator) -
in charge of Economic Planning Unit

Deputies: Mohd Johari Baharum (Umno) (nuff said), Mashitah Ibrahim
(the one who got dropped from contesting and who we never
heard a peep from when she was in PM's Dept before)

(Umno, to be appointed senator), SK Devamany (MIC) and
Hasan Malek (Umno).

__________________________________________________________________

Well, Rafidah got dropped which may be welcomed by some but could
be seen as a major snub of Wanita UMNO. The grassroots ladies
aren't going to like this!!!

I can't say I'm really very thrilled with this Cabinet. I'm pretty happy that
Ng Yen Yen got made Minister for Women and Zaid Ibrahim is put in
charge of Law. I have no idea who Liow Tiong Lai is and what he knows
about health issues. But Mat Taib? Does this mean he's in charge of the
corridors?

The saga continues...


Monday, March 17, 2008

It's Not a Zero-Sum Game, Guys!

In a time of big changes and some turmoil, it's useful to sit back and turn one's mind to other things just to be able to get some perspective. I had to go away for a couple of days to do some family things (mother-in-law's birthday actually) and it was really a welcome relief not to have to listen to constant chatter for a while.

I'm beginning to think that maybe next time, it would be good to have a moratorium on politicians saying anything at least 24 hours after an election just so everyone gets to take a cold shower and clear their brains. Then we won't be subjected to all sorts of 'he said', 'no, he said' stuff. It all just pollutes our minds and gets on our already-frayed nerves.

Looking at the reactions by losers especially, it reminds me of another ongoing battle, that of gender equality. In the long hard fight for women's rights all over the world, one of the persistent problems, and barriers, is that men think that if they give women more rights, they will inevitably lose some or all of theirs. Men think in terms of zero-sum games, that is, "if you win, I lose; if you lose, I win". They find it hard to fathom a situation where both sides may win. And that by giving women equal rights, it did not necessarily mean that men would lose their rights, unless they think of their 'rights' as the right to constantly lord it over everyone else, even when it is detrimental to society.

There have been many examples of how, by giving women equal rights, men and society have not only not suffered but indeed had benefited. No society has crumbled by giving women the vote; indeed today, the idea of any society where only men had the right to make political decisions is fast becoming obsolete, even in countries like Saudi Arabia. In some countries, such as Iran when President Khatami came into power, the women's vote was crucial. Men did not lose their rights at all; indeed there is still room for improvement to bring women up to par in many places.

Another example would be when Grameen Bank first started microcredit programmes among the poorest people of Bangladesh. Many men at first objected to giving women access to credit, assuming that they would not be able to handle money. In fact, the women not only handled the money well and repaid loans on time and in full but these loans went towards making life better for their entire families, not just themselves. Women didn't buy clothes and jewellery for themselves but instead repaired the roofs of their houses, installed better toilets, made sure their children ate properly and went to school. None of this would have happened if the men had remained intransigent in their initial objections.

This particularly male view of change - if you win, I lose - is not confined just to talking about equality for women, it pervades everything. Patriarchy - a social system in which men control a disproportionately large share of power - manifests itself in many different ways, not least in politics. Politics is always viewed as a war, with generals and soldiers. Everything is about winning and losing, with winners taking everything and losers left with nothing.

This, to me, explains the reactions by various people in UMNO to the loss of some states by BN. The pervasive thinking is a patriarchal one; if you won, I lost, and that is unacceptable. If you want equal rights, then I must surely lose mine. Never mind if this flies in the face of logic, that in a country where one ethnic group is numerically dominant, it is near impossible to take away their rights. But the faulty logic of patriarchy and war still dominates.

Some of the extreme reactions in this blog attests to this sort of thinking. Despite the fact that a substantial number of Malay voters voted against BN and UMNO, some people still think that Malays will become a marginalised community in their own land. Some are suggesting that the answer to all this would be to send all Chinese and Indians 'back to their own land'. Yet anyone who's ever taken a drive around this country of ours will attest to the illogic of this. All of the communities that make up our beloved Malaysia are inextricably woven into the fabric that is our country. If you take any part of it away, then the entire fabric will fray, tear and eventually crumble.

Just like in countries where women were given equal rights and society has only benefitted, how would levelling playing fields between all communities disadvantage society? We in Asia cheer today to see Barack Obama standing for President of the United States. Would that have been possible if the white men who dominated American society had insisted that black people could be nothing more than slaves? Or are we in Asia cheering because we think that if Barack comes in, he'll make black people dominant in American society, thus replacing one type of hegemony with another? Or should we rightly cheer him on because he will bring in a diversity at the top which is more reflective of what society really is, that talent has no colour, race nor religion?

Those who lost last Saturday need to stop whingeing and adapt to this new reality, because in any evolving society, those who don't adapt quickly become irrelevant and fade away. Let's stop speculating about the supposed bad things that the new governments are 'bound' to do and just wait and see what they really do. Then when they trip up, we have a right to say something.

Meantime, people need to tidy their own houses. How come there is more turmoil in BN-ruled states than there are in non-BN-ruled states? Everyone else is getting down to work, as well they should be. By the way, if it is true that the new Kedah government came in to work only to find the entire place had been cleared of everything, then I have to wonder what it was that the last government had to hide?

At the Federal level, we are all waiting with bated breath what the Cabinet line-up will be. There are both optimistic and pessimistic speculation. But with a much smaller pool to choose from, I have to wonder what we are going to be left with.

One leaf we could take from the Indonesians when they went through a far greater and violent upheaval than us ten years ago is by doing away with the Ministry of Information. Everyone knows that the Ministry of Information is another name for the Ministry of Propaganda and all this time, the Ministers in charge have all been woefully hopeless, culminating in the incomparable Zam. Why not just do away with it all since there is no way of competing with the many sources of information that people have access to these days, particularly the Internet? What is the point anymore of having a Ministry of Information that provides little information, or at least information that people actually want and need? The 12th GE has shown that you can't control the information that people get so why even try? Instead, encourage a society of curious people, people who hunger for knowledge and who want to advance themselves through knowledge, and who know how to assess the knowledge they receive in an intelligent and open way. Our problem today is that people will believe almost anything, even when it defies logic. And as long as that continues, there will always be people who will take advantage of this unquestioning behaviour.

If we need to have Government-funded TV and radio, then why not set up an independent body like the BBC? The Government ensures that it is financially stable so that it does not have to cater to commercial interests to stay afloat. But it remains independent of any partisan politics. Perhaps then, people will be more interested in RTM again.

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Making Sense of It All

Folks, I'm sorry for being late in writing anything about the elections but so many things have been happening since then that it's been hard to get my mind sorted out enough to really sit down and write.

I don't think I know enough to write an analysis of the entire elections. But two of the best I've read are by Ong Kian Ming and Bridget Welsh, both in Malaysiakini. My little two sen's worth is in my column in The Star today. I can't give you the link because for some reason The Star hasn't uploaded any of my columns after Jan 30. Hmmmm....

Some people have asked me why I continue to write for a mainstream paper. I have to say I wonder myself sometimes, more often lately. But I have been writing that column for 18 years and there are loyal readers there whom I hesitate to abandon. I also think that we still need people like me or Azmi Sharom or Prof Shad Saleem Faruqi, to name three of my fellow Star columnists, just so that there are some sane voices in those papers. Put it this way, sensible articles that appear in the papers will make it into the Internet somehow. But it doesn't work the other way round. So, unless they truly truly piss me off, I think I'll stay.

Anyway, as I've said in a response to a comment under another post, I'm generally happy with the election results. I expected it to be bad for BN but not THIS bad. I can't count how many people I've met since who've confessed that they were longtime BN supporters who voted against them this time and some of these people were very surprising ones. Someone came to deliver roti canai at our house in Alor Setar and apologetically said he had voted PAS this time because he was so 'meluat' (disgusted) with BN. My entire office staff also voted against the BN wherever their constituency was.

Some of the people I talked to come from families that have been UMNO members for generations, whose grandmothers sold their jewellery to help set up UMNO branches, and yet they said their entire family voted against BN.

I think this is something that UMNO in particular doesn't get yet, that their own people abandoned them. I don't mean non-members who have somehow always voted for BN but could conceivably vote otherwise off and on, depending on how they feel. This was a rebellion of card-carrying members. And their reason was exactly the same as that roti canai man and everyone else; just plain disgust. Disgust at what? Well, you know lah.

But I congratulate the winners and wish them good luck. What worries me are the losers. What are they going to do? The electorate may have matured but have the old politicians kept up with them? ;-) I'm hoping that my 'favourite' losers like Zam, Samy, Badaruddin (Jerai) will just go off and tend their gardens or take up knitting or something.

As for the media, they haven't seem to have gotten it in their heads that they contributed greatly to the election results in a negative sense, from their point of view. I couldn't believe some of the headlines during the campaign. One day I counted 'Anwar' mentioned six times in Star headlines alone! The guy's never had so much mainstream press and as they say, bad press is better than no press! They should really review what they did and see the mistakes they made. But will they learn though?

Certainly there has been no let-up in totally puzzling reports like this one:



Pak Lah’s reforms aided more open elections

KUALA LUMPUR: It was due to Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi’s reforms and opening of democratic space that the general election went the way it did, a public forum was told.

Social Strategic Foundation executive director Datuk Dr Dennison Jayasooria and Umno supreme council member Datuk Shahrir Abdul Samad said after winning the 2004 general election, the Prime Minister had opened up democratic space and made substantial changes that involved widespread consultation with the people.

While many have run down Prime Minister Abdullah over his leadership and tried to call for his resignation, this history (in the 2008 elections) would not have been possible if not for him enabling a democratic space in the country,” Dr Jayasooria said.

He said the Prime Minister had also built on the citizens' values and expectations of transparency, accountability, good governance and fight against corruption. For this, the people gave Abdullah a resounding victory in 2004.

The just concluded election, he said, was a test card of the leadership, and the people felt that the Barisan did not stand up to the principles advocated.

Dr Jayasooria also pointed out that the Prime Minister was gracious in losing, and this was a tremendous strength in leadership.

I don’t think other prime ministers would be able to take it in the same fashion. Graciousness in losing is a tremendous strength and something we must value in the nation as we move on,” he said.

Shahrir noted, however, that the issues affecting voters, such as unemployment, crime, rising price of goods, and quality of life, were the same issues faced by developed nations.

Shahrir said despite the Barisan winning an overwhelming victory in 2004, the Prime Minister made substantial changes in Parliament.

“For the first time we had widespread consultation on major bills, which was never done before. We had select committees whose members came from the ruling party and the Opposition, and an active Public Accounts Committee (PAC),” he said.

He said the question now was whether the Barisan could still afford the same kind of luxury.

“But I have faith in the leadership of Pak Lah. It is the man and his beliefs that made us go the way we did,” he declared.

Shahrir also said that one could not ignore the fact that the Barisan might now want to form a coalition government with PAS.

“If the DAP can work with PAS, why can’t we work with PAS. Chinese voters have given their votes to PAS. If you vote for the Opposition, we assume that you accept PAS, and it is an acceptable partner to the Barisan,” he said.

___________________________________________________________________

OK, if anyone can interpret any of the above for me, I would truly appreciate it.

Who's cheating?



Funny that those who ran down the SPR previously now believe so wholeheartedly in their numbers? How is it that the SPR officer at Jerlun announced an 81.95% turnout and yet SPR publishes on their website the turnout as 99.85%, higher than anywhere else? Why was there a three-hour delay in announcing the results?

Somebody not keen on Mukhriz winning? Especially when they might be losing themselves?

Monday, March 10, 2008

And let's stamp our foot now...

Monday March 10, 2008

Annuar blames outstation voters who voted for PAS instead

KOTA BARU: Datuk Seri Annuar Musa said the political tidal wave which hit Kelantan originated from the west coast states.

The Kelantan Barisan Nasional chief described its sixth consecutive loss in the general election since 1990 as a humiliation which was brought on by a tsunami-like wave from the west coast.

He blamed outstation voters who were presumed to be Barisan supporters, but voted for PAS instead.

“This was evident in the voter turnout of over 80% (highest in Malaysia). They came from states which fell such as Kedah, Penang, Selangor and Perak. They brought the virus here and infected us; thus we suffered a stunning loss,” Annuar told a press conference. (Well you shouldn't have encouraged them to go home and vote then...)

He suspects that they were influenced by the Opposition where they lived and worked and when they returned to Kelantan, they decided to vote for PAS while also convincing their family, friends and relatives to do so too.

Annuar said the 12th general election was tough as Barisan was the underdog here, but it was at least confident of denying PAS a two-thirds majority, but instead won only six out of 45 state seats and two out of 14 parliamentary seats. (Not great at predicting, are you?)

Annuar, who was defeated in the Ketereh parliamentary seat, said the country has entered untested and uncharted territory with PAS, PKR and DAP governing five states.

“They are an unproven lot, a marriage-of-convenience coalition and it is an unhealthy trend for a multi-ethic and multi-religious nation.” (huh?)

He cited as an example how PAS, which claims to be a fundamentalist Islamic political entity, could be part of a state government with an alcohol production plant in Selangor. (and how does this illustrate the above?)

Nevertheless, Annuar hoped that political parties in the country would understand the mainstay of the Malaysian spirit, which is a need to co-exist with each other as it is the only proven formula of governance.

Annuar, who is an Umno supreme council member, called on party members to close ranks and be united under party president Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

“This is not the time for emotions. We must regroup and not lash out at anyone. We must be tolerant as Umno faces a big test on the road ahead.

____________________________________________________________________

This is Denial and Petulance Extraordinaire! Blame the same voters you were trying to woo before...tsk, tsk...

Sunday, March 9, 2008

The Day After...

And how the mighty have fallen...! Could anyone have predicted the fall would be this far?

I'm so tired right now from staying up watching the extremely slow results. So won't say much right now til my head is clear.

But bloggers and netizens, you can pat yourselves on the back because anyone who says the Net and blogs would have no effect on this election obviously didn't know what they were talking about! :-D

Saturday, March 8, 2008

To All My Sisters...


Happy International Women's Day today! May we always remember that we are important, that we are needed, that we have something to say and contribute, that we won't just lie down and take it and we aim to stand up and be counted!



May we vote in as many women as we can today! And may we start working from tomorrow to get even more women in elected office the next time.



To everyone, SELAMAT MENGUNDI!!!

p/s was in and out of polling station in less than 15 minutes this morning, including stopping to chat with friends. So quiet! But maybe nobody cares about Segambut.

Lembah Pantai is livelier, with the different parties setting up their tents outside the polling stations.

There's a banner along Jalan Maarof that says "PM Abd Hadi Awang, Welcome to Bangsar!". Why do I get the feeling that PAS didn't put that up?

Friday, March 7, 2008

Bigwigs in Bangsar



Fernandes: Shahrizat is hardworking and very committed

KUALA LUMPUR: AirAsia Bhd group chief executive officer Datuk Tony Fernandes yesterday gave support to Barisan Nasional’s Lembah Pantai parliamentary candidate Datuk Seri Shahrizat Jalil, saying she was hardworking and committed to her constituency.

“I have really never seen anyone who works so hard, like her,” he said speaking at the Barisan’s Speakers’ Corner in Bangsar Baru.

Fernandes said Shahrizat was the first minister to launch the flight piloted by the company’s first female pilot and was also instrumental in ensuring that cabin crew retired at the same age, irrespective of gender. (Hmm...how come she didn't manage to do that with the national airline, MAS?)

Strong support: Fernandes and Shahrizat having a chat after coming out to support her in Bangsar Baru Thursday.
He said it was easy for people to criticise the Government and say they were not given equal opportunities.

“Let me tell you that I am living proof of someone who had no political backing. Through sheer hard work and determination, which every one of us is capable of, we can succeed. (Tony dear, pull the other one...)

“I have lived in the United Kingdom, United States and in Australia, but it is nothing like Malaysia.

“I always knew I would come back to Malaysia,” he said and talked further of his success with Air Asia over the past six years.

Asked to impart advice for Indian Malaysian, Fernandes said there was no specific advice for any one race as Malaysians were equally gifted and capable of being successful.

He said his dream was to see the Barisan Nasional become a party for all Malaysians and not a coalition of component parties.

__________________________________________________________________

Meantime,



my vote for gutsiest candidate in this GE goes to Maimun Yusuf, the 89-year old independent candidate in Kuala Terengganu. She's standing against bigwigs Dato Razali Ismail of UMNO and Mohamad Sabu of PAS. I sure hope she wins, thus striking a blow for women, senior citizens and independents in one fell swoop.

And oh yes, also for bloggers! Tok Mun has her own blog, (which is actually run by some volunteers) but it's pretty good with lots of photos and videos, not to mention postings on what she stands for. So do go take a look. Tok Mun also has a Facebook fan club (just do a search) and an email address, maimunbintiyusuf@gmail.com.


And while you're surfing around, you may want to visit one young man:



Khairy reaches out to Netizens

PETALING JAYA: Umno Youth deputy chief Khairy Jamaluddin, who is contesting the Rembau parliamentary seat, has joined many other general election candidates in the political fray by entering cyberspace to reach out to voters.

Khairy’s website at www.rembau.net.my highlights his personal background, activities and thoughts, with news reports on his campaign trail activities in Rembau, including his daily campaign schedule and pictures.

In his introduction, Khairy stated that his website was a means for him to share his hopes, aspirations and goals.

“My website will show you who I am, what I believe in, what I stand for and what I actually say (as opposed to being taken out of context),” it added. (Uhuh...)

Among the other contents in the website were video-clips on his campaign trail and his explanation on various current issues, including his arguments against the opposition views on the fuel price issue.

Surfers can also write to him at khairy@rembau.net.

Umno Youth media relations officer Isa Nikmat said the movement had used the help of members and supporters to launch websites and blogs in support of Umno Youth when Internet usage became prevalent in the country by 2000.

Umno Youth has a website centred on the general election at www.sediagempur.net which presents arguments against opposition claims.

Khairy himself is reported to be involved in planning Umno’s Internet campaign strategy to widen the party’s appeal to more people. (Widen the party's appeal...?!)

Isa said most of the “cyber troopers” might not necessarily be Umno Youth members or working for the party, but they were supporters who want to give the party’s viewpoints through the Internet. (Really, now...)

___________________________________________________________

And they keep telling us that the Internet doesn't matter....






Wednesday, March 5, 2008

Jerlun: Campaigning in the Padi Fields

Mukhriz chats up a very young voter in Kubang Sepat

This is what you need if you’re a candidate in the elections. You need stamina first of all. Otherwise whatever energy you have will flag by the time you’re done with the fifteenth visit to a ‘ballot box’ community for the day. And you’ve only done 80 of these so far and still have 70 more to do by the time election day comes round. Forget about sleeping or eating properly, or seeing your loved ones at a decent hour of the day.

Next, you need a voice that just never gives out. Because you make speeches at each and every stop, and if you’re any good, they aren’t all the exact same speech but tailored to each community you visit.

Then you need a strong stomach. Because everywhere you go, especially if you have a pretty rural constituency, you’re expected to eat. Not that that’s bad because the food is often very very good. But you’ll eat several times a day and you just pray that none of it works badly in your stomach because you really can’t afford to be sidelined by diarrhoea.

And you need great facial muscles because you need to smile, smile and smile. You need to charm the socks off the kampung folk and it better be genuine because they can see if it isn’t.

This is what you need if you’re just following a candidate around: the patience to put up with perpetually getting lost and therefore being late for his next appointment. Or worse still, missing him altogether.

I went up to Jerlun yesterday to follow my brother Mukhriz around and see how an election campaign works. It’s been elections 101 in double-quick time for me. But it’s been instructive and interesting to say the least.

Jerlun is a rural constituency with some 40,000 plus voters, about 90% of whom are Malay. It’s lots and lots of flat padi fields, at the moment just harvested and dry, with only Gunung Keriang looming up like an elephant to break up the landscape. It’s not all that big in size but because the roads have to go round the padi fields, going from one place to another takes time. And places here have pretty colourful names like Lana Bulu, Matang Bonglai, Batas Bengkok, Bukit Hantu, Kampung Melele, Kampung Putat, Sanglang and Kodiang.

Local Kubang Sepat political chieftain cum wise guy

I first caught up with my brother at a place called Kamoung Sepat. The minute I arrived, I had to sit down to sample Mee Rebus Kampung Sepat (which by the way, is delicious) with two local gentlemen who had a way with one-liners in their thick Kedah accent which would put many a city stand-up comedian to shame. They are proud of being Kubang Sepat born and bred and knew that their roles as local political chieftains are not to be ignored.

The Kubang Sepat ladies and I indulge in some girl talk

After eating I went into the hall to chat with the women, my brother having already gone off to his next stop. This is a very poor community but they turned up in their best clothes, curious to see who this new guy was. With me, they wanted to know about our family. What number am I in the family? What number is Mukhriz? How many children do my parents have? How many do I? (“ONLY three?”) Some of the young ones giggled and said they thought my brother was ‘segak’ (handsome). Apparently there had been rampant stealing of his posters by the younger female constituents.

The ladies and I were warming up to some real girl talk when someone said I should really move on if I wanted to catch up with Mukhriz at the next stop. One whole round of salams and photos followed before I could climb back into the car and leave. Then we were off, looking for the next community hall.

Which, in fact, we never found. I don’t know what they did before there were handphones but even with constantly calling people in my brother’s entourage, we never caught up with them. We drove down flag and banner-lined country roads, made several turns, stopped to check with whoever’s supposed to be in the know…but we never caught up with them.

It did mean that I got a look at a large part of the constituency. It’s poor. I’m not sure what one can do to bring development there. They have schools, not much industry and problems like large numbers of single mothers.

In 2004, the BN candidate won by only about 2000 votes majority. Indeed in many areas of Jerlun, PAS is very strong and you can certainly tell by the numbers of green flags and banners. You see banners that say, “Give Islam A Chance” strung up across kampung lanes. So it’s not a place where the BN candidate gets an easy ride.

We finally decided to give up for the day and return home (which is the family house in Titi Gajah). In the evening, there would be another programme visiting some MCA centres. I went home to rest and change.

My brother had no such luck. He didn’t get a chance to come back so a change of clothes had to be dispatched to him. I don’t know where he changed into them but he looked fresh enough by the time his wife and I caught up with him at the MCA gathering in Alor Biak.

The Ketua Cawangan MCA Alor Biak gives his opening speech

The Chinese in Jerlun are only 8.6% but they’re an active community. At Alor Biak, the ‘hall’, which apparently is normally a hairdresser’s garage, was filled with mostly middle-aged Chinese men, tanned and swarthy. The programme started with the head of that MCA division giving a speech in fluent Kedahan. He said he supports BN 100% but had two questions to ask the candidates ( the candidate for the state seat of Air Hitam, Dato Othman Aziz, was also present). One was why the local Pemuda UMNO spent all their time fighting with the local MCA and Gerakan folks, and secondly, why was it that there are government officers who seem to discriminate against the Chinese community. These were questions he would like answered by whoever gets elected.

But he said there was no way he could support PAS because he said he used to attend their ceramahs and their candidates were always talking about sending the Chinese and Indians ‘home’. So there was no way he or his friends could support them.

He pointed out that there were no jobs there in Alor Biak so people went elsewhere to earn their living. “Tapi,” he said, “orang Cina sini sayang kawasan ni. Nanti pilihanraya, depa balik ke kawasan nak undi.” (I really wish I could catch the total flavour of the way he talked.)

Then the two candidates did their thing and then we ate. Luckily we opted to just have kuih at this stop, because at the next one, another MCA gathering in Air Hitam, they served a full meal.


Mukhriz and his wife Norzieta laughing at a joke, Air Hitam MCA gathering

I rather enjoyed these Chinese community gatherings for their sheer informality. People had no qualms about sitting in the front row and talking on their phones while the candidates did their spiel. The womenfolk were casually dressed but obviously enthusiastic about their election work. Everyone speaks fluent Kedahan but appreciated hugely the few words of Mandarin that the candidates attempted.

After an hour, my brother had to once again move on and my sister-in-law (who is five months’ pregnant) and I decided that we’d head home. But before we did that, we agreed to drop by the Bilik Gerakan run by the local Wanita UMNO.

Dato Maznah and Puan Bashariah run the numbers by us, Air Hitam, Jerlun


Wanita UMNO Jerlun is headed by a formidable woman, Dato Maznah Hamid, otherwise known as the Iron Lady. She’s a plump affable nonstop talker who was born in Jerlun. The ladies there feel that she should have been made the candidate for the constituency but she herself brushes it off as unimportant. Instead she’s marshaled her ladies to do all the operations work for my brother’s campaign.

If the candidate is the head in any constituency, the local Wanita are the arms, legs, eyes and ears of it. The Jerlun ladies briefed me on the simple yet sophisticated way they campaign, which essentially involves going house to house and persuading voters with strong arguments. Who needs fancy pollsters when these ladies can pretty much tell you which household is going to vote for whom?

Puan Bashariah, the second-in-command in Jerlun, is a 62-year old who has 30 years of experience in running election campaigns. And her enthusiasm and energy hasn’t seemed to wane at all. She has a big board up with all the statistics that she needs and both she and Dato Maznah keep the other ladies motivated each day right up til polling day. When we met them, it was already 11pm and they were not about to go home yet. Some lived far and had to contend with going home at odd hours of the night.

We talked about what their husbands thought of their work. They all laughed and said they had understanding husbands who just made do while election season was on. Puan Bashariah was also organizing her son’s wedding in the midst of all this, and handed me an invitation for the majlis perkahwinan on March 8 itself.

The Wanita were well aware of their importance to the campaign. They were disappointed that more women, especially their head, had not been fielded as candidates and that the few who were in Kedah were given very difficult seats. But they said they were loyal enough to still roll up their sleeves and work for whichever candidate they were handed. However, after the elections, they were going to demand something in return from Mukhriz. If he wins, he has to pay attention to the women and their problems in that constituency. And they have a few, including, by the way, because of the fishing communities along the coast, a drug and AIDS problem.

This morning I went down for breakfast only to find that, having returned at 3am, my brother was already out of the house. I could only catch up with him at his 11am programme, which in fact began at about 11.45am. That’s the nature of campaigning. You can schedule all you want but something will come up to mess it up.

The second stop was at KEDA Ponchan, which is a community hall run by the Kedah Development Authority mostly for single mothers. There, they are given training in sewing and food production. There are also micro-credit programmes for them run by Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia.

After the various speeches, during which time I could smell the ikan kering being fried, we sat down to eat. Very simple food; white rice, some meat dipped in kuah asam made with lots of tomatoes, onions and chilli and the ikan kering. I had meant to eat and run as I had a plane to catch but the food was so delicious, I finished my entire plate of rice and then ratah’d ( ate the food without any rice) some more.

Another round of salams and photos, then I had to dash off. Meantime my brother was already on his way somewhere else.

Little boy in non-BN colours, KEDA Pochan, Jerlun

Obviously in following only my brother around, this is a very BN-centred account. I would have liked to have also gone to see the PAS candidates on their rounds. But apart from the flags and banners, you actually don’t ever come across them. I guess the constituency’s big enough that you can go around without ever bumping into your rivals. It’s all very civil though, with none of the type of heckling that you expect from rival camps. Sometimes the flags are even all mixed up with one another.

But it’s another few days yet. Nobody is resting until polling stations close and the counting starts. It’s an endurance test like nothing else.

Tuesday, March 4, 2008

Meanwhile...an Important Digression...

While we are fighting our little battles, other people are fighting some very serious ones with major losses of life. We can't ignore it.

Israel warns of escalation but looks beyond violence

Military strategy alone may not topple Hamas, leaders believe

# Rory McCarthy in Gaza
# The Guardian,
# Monday March 3 2008


An Israeli riot policeman hurls a smoke grenade towards rioting Palestinians in the Shuafat refugee camp on the outskirts of Jerusalem, March 2 2008. Photograph: Kobi Gideon/EPA

Israeli leaders say despite the large loss of life, the military strikes in Gaza over the past five days are only a limited operation and warn a much larger and more violent confrontation with the Islamist movement Hamas draws ever closer.

As a start, Israel has given its stated aim as stopping Palestinian militants from firing makeshift rockets, known as Qassams, into southern Israel. "This will not be achieved in the next two days, but we will continue the activity with all our strength," Ehud Barak, the defence minister, said yesterday. "And we need to prepare for escalation, because the big ground operation is real and tangible."

However, at the same time, they admit a military strategy alone may not achieve their goal. A series of similar Israeli incursions in 2006 killed around 400 Palestinians, of whom about half were civilians, but failed to halt the rockets.

Some Israeli ministers talk openly of their desire to topple Hamas from its position of strength in Gaza, though many analysts say that could only come at great cost. On the ground, the reality is that the fight has long been under way. In January alone, 80 Palestinians were killed in Gaza. Rounds of violence are becoming more frequent and more deadly. The deaths on Saturday in particular - when more than 60 Palestinians, including several civilians, were killed - mark the bloodiest day in the conflict for many years.

Short of a full military occupation of Gaza, the other options being considered by Israel include a redeployment onto the Philadelphi Corridor, the narrow stretch of land at Gaza's southern border with Egypt, or a temporary military occupation of areas of northern Gaza from where the rockets are being fired. Amos Harel, the military correspondent of the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz, suggested the operation might simply be "retaliatory.

"The aim, in this case, would be to 'exact a price' for purposes of deterrence," he wrote. The military might also again begin targeting Hamas political leaders for assassination as well as continuing its "economic warfare", limiting most imports, including electricity, into what it calls the "hostile entity" of Gaza.

In the end, Israel's political leaders speak confidently of somehow unseating Hamas, the movement which seized full control of Gaza last summer.

"The combination of steps against Gaza will bring an end to the Hamas regime in Gaza," Haim Ramon, the vice prime minister, told reporters recently. "If the Palestinians in Gaza are paying the price we are very sorry but it is the responsibility of the leaders they elected."

Israel's dilemma

Yet Israel is caught in its own dilemma: it refuses to negotiate with Hamas and yet is deeply reluctant to deploy thousands of troops in a full military occupation. Nahum Barnea, Israel's most respected newspaper columnist, called this "a choice between the plague and cholera". Yet he said it appeared unavoidable.

"Either the IDF [Israel Defence Force] seizes renewed control over the Gaza Strip or extensive parts of it, or Israel begins open, direct and serious negotiations with Hamas," he wrote in the Yedioth Ahronoth yesterday. "The third way, of assassinating and taking rocket fire, taking rocket fire and assassinating, regrettably won't produce the desired result: it won't stop the rocket fire and it won't stop the arms smuggling."

In Gaza, Hamas has its own difficulties. Although it won elections, it has found no answer to the economic blockade imposed on it. The movement's popularity is hard to gauge. For a while it appeared to have dipped, though the economic crisis, particularly the collapse of private business, may oddly have reinforced its position by making the population more dependent on its leaders. Hamas' response, at least in the past few weeks, has been to step up the violence. In January, for the first time in months, it began to claim rocket attacks in its own name and then in early February launched its first suicide bombing inside Israel in more than three years. In the past week it has begun to launch a larger make of rockets with a longer range, enough to reach the Israeli city of Ashkelon, 11 miles away. Ghassan Khatib, a Palestinian political analyst, argues that this is Hamas trying to find a way out of the impasse.

Dominant

He says Hamas wants to become the dominant Palestinian force fighting the Israeli occupation and seeks some kind of military stalemate with Israel, in the same way it believes Hizbollah has done in southern Lebanon. Khatib echoes Harel's assertion about Israel's goals when he says Hamas wants "deterrence".

"Hamas has been inspired by Hizbollah," Khatib wrote in a recent essay.

Amid all this it is easy to forget that the call to greater war is not the sole voice. There are those on both sides arguing for negotiations instead of conflict.

On the Israeli side they include some unexpected names like Eli Moyal, the mayor of Sderot, the town most often targeted by rockets, and Giora Eiland, the former head of Israel's National Security Council. An opinion poll published in Ha'aretz last week said 64% wanted the government to negotiate with Hamas for a ceasefire.

Hamas itself is reported to have suggested a ceasefire, though the details are unclear. In the background there is the slow process of negotiation, begun in Annapolis last November, between Israel and the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas. Yesterday Abbas suspended the talks, though they are likely to restart in future. His aides say the more the conflict rages, the weaker his credibility among Palestinians. Yet the report card is bleak: there has been little change on the ground and there is a growing sense on both sides that the process is heading nowhere.

Timeline

2007

November 27 George Bush hosts peace talks between Israeli leader Ehud Olmert and the Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas at Annapolis in the United States. The conference is billed as a starting point for a negotiated peace agreement. Eventually, all sides would agree to a separate Palestinian state to exist, alongside Israel, and so end years of territorial conflict.

2008

January 25: Palestinians in the grip of an Israeli economic blockade spill over the Egyptian border to buy essential provisions.

February 4: An Israeli woman is killed by a suicide bomber in Dimona, in the first such attack by Palestinian militants in over a year. Israel blames Hamas's armed wing, and pounds Gaza with rockets, killing at least 10.

February 27: An Israeli helicopter fires missiles at vehicles carrying suspected Palestinian paramilitary. Five are killed.

February 29: Israeli border towns come under attack from Palestinian militants. Israel's deputy defence minister says his forces will have "no choice" but to invade Gaza if the attacks continue.

March 2: Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas suspends contact with Israel after their sustained assault on Gaza which left about 100 people dead.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Avaaz.org, the community of global citizens who take action on the major issues facing the world today, have organised an online petition to persuade both the Israeli and the Palestinian leaders to agree to a ceasefire before there are more deaths and suffering. If you would like to sign it, please go here.

Sunday, March 2, 2008

Corporate Campaigning in Bangsar, or How to Fill a Rainy Sunday evening


I got an sms today to say that there was going to be a talk by Dato Nazir Razak at Devi's Corner. How strange, why would he hang out at a mamak shop and give a speech?

It turns out that he wasn't speaking at Devi's Corner where it is now (it's recently been moved to another corner in Bangsar because the old corner is being gentrified) but where it was before. Which happens to have become Dato Shahrizat's meeting hall in Bangsar, very convenient for its location in the heart of latte-land.

The talk started an hour late because the candidate was late. It seems that we were to have a double-bill, Shahrizat and Nazir. Apparently Nazir is the first in a whole series of corporate types who will be speaking on why they are supporting BN and Shahrizat. Tomorrow will be Tony Fernandez's turn.

It's a strange concept to me, to get corporate types to speak. But Shahrizat, in her introductory remarks, said that they were inviting 'interesting' speakers to speak on anything. "They can even criticise the Government!" she added. (In which case, they should probably invite Izzah.)

It was a portend of a Hillary-esque speech to come, geared to appeal to the liberal independent-minded Bangsar type. Noting the presence of Rocky of RockyBru, she invited him to come up and stand beside her (he didn't) and remarked that she would be happy to have a panel of bloggers there to speak, rather than attack the BN anonymously only. "I want to lift the veil on bloggers." she said, rather grandly, thus betraying typical Government ignorance about the difference between bloggers and commenters.

There were more grand charitable gestures. "I understand why Nurul Izzah would want to stand here. She's been through a lot, after what her father had gone through so any daughter would do that. So I have told my people they must give her and her father the greatest respect. It's not about the Opposition but about what we can do for Malaysia."

Perhaps there was some reverse psychology in play here. Otherwise what would you make of statements like this: "I don't want one million votes if they are not due to me. If you don't think these votes are due to me, then don't vote for me." Or this: "I've been telling all potential voters to please go to Opposition ceramahs. I don't want them to make uninformed choices."

But then came the crunch. "If BN wins, Abdullah Ahmad Badawi will be the PM." (Did I hear a palpable collective sigh of disappointment there?) But, "If the Opposition wins, then Ustaz Hadi will be the PM!". Guaranteed to send shivers down the back of the latte crowd. So, that's our informed choice right there, the devil and the deep blue sea.



Then Nazir got up to speak and started off by giving two reasons why he wanted to help. Firstly, he thought it was important to return the BN to government with an unambiguous majority, and secondly, he wanted to see this HPM (High Performance Minister) back in government. So basically he's endorsing her here in this constituency. I find it interesting that he should be campaigning for a Minister whose performance has nothing to do with his industry; shouldn't he be campaigning for the Finance Minister II?

I really wonder about the wisdom of having a corporate type speaking at a political rally. For one thing, some of the examples he gave for why there has been change flies over the head of most people. He cited the reform of the GLCs as one example of a promise that the Government is keeping. There is apparently now greater tolerance for a diversity of opinion and he cited the views of people like Shahrir Samad and Tun Musa Hitam being heard as examples of differing opinions. Hmmm.....funny how Dad's opinions are not cited...

For another thing, it must be hard for a corporate person to genuinely sound pro-government when there are obviously policies which he cannot agree with. Talking about the competitive landscape globally and how Malaysians can participate in it invariably brought up the question of education. Nazir was asked by one person what he thought about the flip-flopping policy on teaching Maths and Science in English which he sidestepped. When asked again he said he didn't answer first time because he didn't agree with it and had told the Minister of Education so. That may sit well in Bangsar but it doesn't in the heartland and ultimately, is the Minister going to listen to the latte-sippers in Bangsar or the many more voters in the rest of the country?

Many of those who had come to listen started to ask Nazir policy questions. Which seems to miss the target really because he's not the one making policy. In the end, one frustrated questioner said, "Why do we have a Q &A with a banker? We should be having a Q&A with the PM!" As it happens, the PM is due to speak in Lembah Pantai tomorrow (Monday) but whether there will be a Q&A with him is another matter.

Obviously the Bangsar lot were more interested in national issues. There were questions about integration in schools, about the high cost of living these days, about how to attract overseas Malaysians home. But many of them were not voting in Lembah Pantai and those who are will elect a candidate who is not going to bring up these issues anyway. So I don't see the point, other than to give Bangsar folk an interesting way to spend an evening.

Bangsar Gets Electionised...

My street got re-tarred overnight the other day. In fact they are still tarring the streets in my area which didn't really need it and certainly not right now. It means that we have to keep finding different ways to get home because the roads keep getting blocked by heavy machinery intent on making our roads 'nicer'. I'm not sure this will make my neighbours vote for the BN candidate really. I actually vote elsewhere so they can tar my road as many times as they want, it's not going to do much.

Meanwhile, my area of Bangsar has turned into Bollywood. That's what it looks like with posters of a very photoshopped candidate being put up everywhere, and strings of BN streamers criss-crossing above our heads. Along Jalan Maarof, the BN banners have been printed wrongly (to my fussy eye) because the 'dacing' is facing sideways instead of the right side up. If you put anything on a sideways dacing, they will just slide out, not get weighed at all, right?

The old Devi's Corner has turned into BN campaign headquarters, right in the heart of latte-land. You can conveniently sit in Coffee Bean or Starbucks and check out from afar what they are doing in there. Not much from what I can see. But there are photo books filled with photos of the candidate being distributed, presumably as silent testimony to what she has been doing for us in Bangsar. No nice photos of what's been done about the parking problem or the rubbish though...

Meantime the opponents have been severely out-Bollywooded. You get some banners of Nurrul Izzah, looking very freshfaced and towards some unseen point above us, along the road to Megamall but that's about it. It's hard to be modest and yet get your mug known at the same time I guess.

As for the independent candidate, Periasamy Nagaratnam, there isn't an inkling yet as to what he looks like or what he sounds like. Actually you don't get to hear much of anyone unless you go looking. Many years ago I lived in Japan. During election time, the rules were that you could put up posters and banners only at certain places but you coul d make yourself heard anywhere. Thus posters featuring the candidates were placed at designated billboards, all side by side, while trucks with loudhailers would sweep through the neighbourhoods, yelling out the candidates' names and exhorting people to vote for them. It might make for tidier streets but was certainly noise-polluting. Here, you get messy streets but apart from that, you wouldn't hear that an election was on.

It would be nice to hear what candidates have to say side by side, say in a debate situation. But, according to Rafidah, this is not our style:



Rafidah: US style debate not for us

KUALA KANGSAR: There is no place for American style debate in this country, said Wanita Umno leader Datuk Seri Rafidah Aziz.

The incumbent Kuala Kangsar MP said it would be more fruitful if the country’s leaders spent more time dealing with the people’s problems rather than mimicking the United States’ presidential election system.

“We don’t follow the American system in our country.

We (the country’s leaders) should be debating with villagers or town folks concerning local issues affecting them,” she said when commenting on an invitation by PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi to participate in an open debate like the one involving US Democratic presidential candidates Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton on March 5.

Earlier, Rafidah performed a groundbreaking ceremony for the new wing of the SJK(C) Tsung Wah, a private Chinese vernacular school costing about RM1mil.

“So far, the school has raised about RM900,000 of which RM300,000 came from the Government,” she said.

_________________________________________________________________

A bit funny coming from the one BN person who would actually do quite well in a debate. But what's wrong with debates anyway? And since when do they debate with villagers? Or do they confuse telling people what they are going to do with debate?

I'd like to see on TV a whole panel of the leaders of each party debating on national issues. Why not? They have their manifestos, surely they can get up and defend them, point by point. It would be great. What exactly is so American about it other than the format?

Unlike the States, we don't have polls here but we do have surveys. The Star regularly commissions surveys which come out with conclusions like 'Malaysians will come out in full force to vote'. Like, duh....we regularly have high voter turnout anyway. The other conclusions were:

> Malaysians want their security to be guaranteed and for the country to continue to develop and prosper. This is their hope for the future. (and why would we want anything else?)

> A high number of respondents feel that the future was bright, including many which stated that Malaysia had “a very good future”. (Really? Nobody I've ever talked to said this.)

> 70% of voters agreed that MPs loved to help the people. (Well, yeah...why we would vote in people who DIDN't love to help people?)

> The newspaper is still the principal choice of media for Malaysians as their source of news and other information, despite the increasing use of the Internet. (So why worry about bloggers?)

> Despite various negative issues and criticisms that had cropped up in the country recently, the support for the Barisan Nasional among the respondents remains very strong. (Uhuh...would they have printed these results otherwise?)

It's another week to go and no doubt we'll get even sillier statements coming out daily. What fun...