Obama acknowledges the cheers at his speech at Cairo University.I guess it must be normal for any healthily sceptical person to view the buzz about Obama's speech 'to the Muslim world' with some cynicism. Why all the fuss? And what's with this 'Muslim world' business when the Muslim world is so diverse? Why speak in Cairo and not in Jakarta, the capital of the largest Muslim country in the world.
Whatever it was, I tuned into the CNN live broadcast, not least because I was also asked by one of the wire services to comment afterwards.
Anyway...I remain healthily sceptical. Which I think any intelligent person should be, because after all, it is just a speech and what matters is what happens afterwards, what is the follow-through.
Having said that, as a speech it was impressive. When was the last time we ever heard the President of the United States greet anyone with 'Assalamualaikum' without mangling it? Never. It so helps not to have a Texan accent when you have to sprinkle foreign words in your speech.
And sprinkle he did. He quoted from the Quran three times, he remembered to say 'Peace be upon him' after mentioning the Prophet Mohamed ( to great cheers), he pronounced most Arabic words pretty accurately with the exception of 'hijab'. which came out as 'hajib'. Hopefully that's not obscene in Arabic.
But generally he said most of the right things. He acknowledged that tensions have been building over a long time between the US and the Muslim world and this was not going to change overnight. But that there were commonalities between both worlds that can be used to create peace. He acknowledged Islam's contributions to knowledge, science, arts and many other areas on which Western civilisation was built but subtly mentioned that now it is the US that leads in progress. He made a point of stating how much a part Islam plays in American history; the first foreign country to recognise American independence was Morocco. (Boy, does he have good researchers to dig up that factoid!). Obama also acknowledged the contributions American Muslims have made to their country and nicely slipped in that the first Muslim Congressman, Keith Ellison, took his oath of office by swearing on a copy of the Quran originally owned by Thomas Jefferson. ( Clunk! Sound of some Malaysians fainting at the thought of a Quran owned by an infidel American President...)
In what was an acknowledgement of a major irritation for many Muslims, Obama swore to fight negative stereotypes of Muslims, presumably in the American media (hmmm...did Fox TV carry this speech? Let's start there, Barack!). But he said, Muslims must also forsake stereotypes they carry about Americans. Which are of course plentiful and just as idiotic and whimsical as Americans' stereotypes about Muslims. (No, he didn't say that...not the idiotic part).
In typical academic fashion, Obama had seven key messages to present to the Muslim world. First was to confront 'violent extremism'. It was interesting to note that the word 'terrorist' is now taboo in Obamaworld. It is now replaced with 'violent extremists', which presumably can be applied to anyone, Muslim or not. In doing this, he used Afghanistan to illustrate how he was dealing with extremists. The US did not go into Afghanistan by choice, he said, they went in by necessity to go after Al-Qaeda who are evil and dangerous. "These are not opinions, these are facts." he said. Pointing out that such violent extremists also kill thousands of Muslims, he said that the US will increase their commitment to fight them by pouring in billions for development in Afghanistan and Pakistan. He didn't say whether they would stop the drones bombing civilians in those places though.
Iraq, however, was a war of choice; by implication a bad one made by the Bush administration. The Obama administration is committed to pulling out of Iraq, once they are sure it can stand on its own, and leaving it to the Iraqis. US combat brigades are to be pulled out by August this year and all Americans should be out of there by 2012. Aha, an exit plan!
He also reiterated that torture will be forbidden for any prisoners and that Guantanamo will be closed by early 2010. We shall see....
Of course, there was no escaping the question of Palestine and Obama took the bull by the horns. Saying that the bonds the US has with Israel are unbreakable, Obama nevertheless expressed sympathy with the plight of the Palestinians, unable to live with dignity in their own land. He reiterated the need for a two-state solution and again repeated in no uncertain terms that Israel has to stop the settlements in the West Bank. In return, he called for Palestinian responsibility in stopping violence and recognition of Israel's right to exist. Whether Netanyahu or the Palestinian Authority or Hamas will listen to any of this is the real question. There needs to be some incentive somewhere to make them do this. But at least he said this out loud within shouting distance of Israel, and recognised the root causes of Palestinian unhappiness and suffering.
In talking about Iran and its nuclear programme, Obama actually acknowledged that the US played a role in overthrowing a democratically elected government in Iran way back in the 50s. But he reaffirmed (though I'm not sure when this was ever US policy) that the US seeks a world in which no nation has nuclear weapons. Presumably he means this includes the largest nuclear power in the world, the US itself, and the largest nuclear power in the Middle east, Israel. Otherwise, Iran is not going to believe him. Nuclear energy for peaceful purposes however, he said, is OK.
His fourth key message was about democracy. "Let me be clear," he said, "No system of government can or should be imposed upon one nation by any other." Unlike previous administrations, "America does not presume to know what is best for everyone, just as we would not presume to pick the outcome of a peaceful election." Really, I think that is one of the best things he said. It acknowledges that they used to presume to know what was best for everyone and did used to pick the outcome of peaceful elections.
Religious freedom was another key message, one that hopefully many Muslim and Muslim-majority governments will hear.
"Freedom of religion is central to the ability of peoples to live together. We must always examine the ways in which we protect it. For instance, in the United States, rules on charitable giving have made it harder for Muslims to fulfill their religious obligation. That is why I am committed to working with American Muslims to ensure that they can fulfill zakat.
"Likewise, it is important for Western countries to avoid impeding Muslim citizens from practicing religion as they see fit - for instance, by dictating what clothes a Muslim woman should wear. We cannot disguise hostility towards any religion behind the pretence of liberalism." (This sounded like a dig at France...).
Related to this is the issue of women's rights. "I reject the view of some in the West that a woman who chooses to cover her hair is somehow less equal, but I do believe that a woman who is denied an education is denied equality. And it is no coincidence that countries where women are well-educated are far more likely to be prosperous." Yup, no coincidence indeed.
And finally, in talking about economic development, we got a mention. "There need not be contradiction between development and tradition. Countries like Japan and South Korea grew their economies while maintaining distinct cultures. The same is true for the astonishing progress within Muslim-majority countries from Kuala Lumpur to Dubai. In ancient times and in our times, Muslim communities have been at the forefront of innovation and education." (And he pronounced KL correctly too!).
I have to say that overall it was a well-crafted speech which pushed all the right buttons. He said everything we wanted him to say and a bit more. The very fact that the President of the US was saying these things, albeit one who is already visually groundbreaking, is itself something. You just can't imagine Bush saying any of these things.
The challenge, as Obama himself ackowledged, is to translate what he says into action, to walk the talk. Until we see real action, I think I'll remain healthily sceptical.
For the full text of Obama's speech, please see this.

28 comments:
Hope his enthuism and hope spill to his people...
You seem to be very cynical of the speech by the US president..
According to the Jerusalem Post and The Huffington Post, Jews are angry that Obama didn't use the word "terror even once." Now you know who has invented it.
Thanks for the charming and easy to read comments and summary... and I smiled!
Hi sis,
Don't know why he forgotten to touch on the following if he is truly sincere or just being coward to test his own medicine.
http://www.criminalisewar.org/blog/2009/04/speech-by-tun-dr-mahathir-bin-mohamad.html
words are just merely words without proper actions...
hope there is action taken, not only empty words...
Indeed his speech contents were very positive. How effective they are is yet to be seen.
Like you, I too remain skeptical.
Politics, either worldwide or domestically here have made my cuppa tea too bitter already. I refuse to indulge and add in any cube of sugar to make it sweet.
thanks for sharing this..which got me a lil excited too..not bcos our capital was being mentioned...but merely what he said stands for what a lot of people deem needs to change...i ain't muslim..but i do believe that a world of freedom of religion is possible..if people choose to do so..:)
Hallo Mam,
Don't know why Obama forgotten to say Malaysia (with its Islam Hadari + 1Malaysia) as a "Role Model" for other islamic countries in the world ..
Do you know why?
Please correct me if I am wrong but isn't the use of 'Assalamualaikum' by a non-Muslim to a Muslim is wrong? Just as the use of the word Allah by a non-Muslim is not permitted in Malaysia.
Obviously we do not expect Obama to cover all the issue of the world in an hour or so speech.
Besides the unprecedented quotes and references made by any US president...what he had said had put a few major issues into proper perspective.
He had said it like it is :- what is white is white and black is black BUT when he said the road is gonna be long and difficult .... he had added a whole lot of gray areas too.
This olive leaf branch speech is definitely a good start so far.
Jimmy, 'Assalamualaikum' means 'Greetings of peace to you'. It is not limited to Muslims only. Indeed I think it would be very nice if non-Muslims were to use it, especially to Muslims. The proper response is 'Mualaikumsalam' (And peace greetings to you too).
Saw snippets of the speech during news on the opposite side of the world where they are obviously not interested in Obama's speech. Over here the attitude is like, why this need to appease? Likening it to the appeasing speeches of Chamberlain the pre WWII PM of Britain.
My only thought when I heard the speech was when he said 'Assalamualaikum". I was thinking, my God, in at least 9 of the states in Malaysia he would have run foul of the law!!! So, I guess, as a law abiding Malaysian my concern should be how someone can run foul of our laws and yet we have Malaysians singing praises or even giving it a nod. Sceptical though it may be!!
Can someone please show me the exact law that says that non-Muslims can't say 'Assalamualaikum'?
Interesting recap of Obama's speech. Thank you for sharing your thought. This entry - a very good read, I must admit.
As for being so-called 'remains healthily sceptical' until he proves he can translate those words into actions -- that is so nice of you. It would be much nicer I think.. if you could do the same to (the leaders of) Melaka for their Arab Village project. Being HEALTHILY sceptical, rather than being sarcastically (unhealthily?) sceptical.
I'm sure Malaysian learders too do deserve a chance to prove themselves. Remain healthily sceptical, until they fail/succeed to walk the talk.
After all, developing an Arab Village for tourists -- is a much easier (and, more realistic) task compared to trying to fix the world, no? :)
Peace.
Can someone please show me the exact law that says that non-Muslims can't say 'Assalamualaikum'?
==============================
Through my past experiences, Marina...it is more a cultural/custom/tradition/way of life thingy rather than what the religion says. I doubt whether there are really written laws. Old Fart is just being ignorant too, just like the other fellow Malay muslims.
I too responded to mualaikumsalam to greetings from fellow non-muslims friends. Most are shocked to hear my response as they told me sometimes when they greeted other malay friends, they refused to acknowledge but instead ticked them off..."non-muslims can't greet with assalamualaikum".
You know, just like the 'Allah' word and keeping dogs as pets.
Old Fart ,
yeah , think I read that one before... which are the 9 states may i know ??
Not too long ago over the "Allah" debate it was reported that 4 territories had not got their Shariah laws synchronised with the rest. A list of words were cited for words not permissable for non-Muslim usage. I do believe "Assalamualiaikum" was also mentioned amongst them. I will take back this if this is not the case.
I wonder whether it is an offence if I used the word "Assalamualiaikum" to my Muslim brothers and sisters.You see there was an outcry when non-muslims used the word "Allah" in the Christian's paper and it really cracks my head whether the Arabs would also take offence or not!
I'm totally confused . Are the words Assalamualiaikum and Allah "patented" in Malaysia to be solely by Malaysian Muslim ?
Only in Malaysia do I find this business of Muslims finding it offensive for non-Muslims to say assalamualaikum. My Coptic Christian Arab friends from Egypt, my Maronite Christian Arab friends from Lebanon and my Palestinian Christian Arab friends from the West Bank and Gaza Strip say assalamualaikum when greeting their Arabic breathrens, both Muslims and non-Muslims. Same goes for my Sephardic Jewish friends whose families came from Yemen, Morocco, Egypt, Iraq etc.
And no Muslim Arab I met have ever made an issue of this. To Arabs, this is just a greeting in the Arabic language and it promotes good will, obviously. Can you imagine if Malays took offence if an English or French say salam sejahtera?
It may well be a Malay ( as opposed to a Muslim) to be wary of a non-Muslim saying Assalamualaikum. But there is nothing to stop a Muslim from greeting non-Muslims with it and expecting an answer back. I have done it myself and after a second's hesitation, people have responded, usually in English. What is important is that we both sincerely mean peace upon each other.
MM ,
Why a second's hesitation ??
Does this means that we are not sure how to respond to such a greeting and have to respond in English ?
My FAQ is : Is it legal for non- Muslim to use Assalamualaikum or respond with Mualaikumsalam , that's what i need to know ? . Can you confirm that ?
It's a very Malay thing to overreact over trifle things, just like our irrational fear of dogs and the usage of the word 'Allah' (after all, even Arab Christians and Jews refer to God as 'Allah'). Malays seem to be very insecure with our Islamic identity and we easily overreact when non-Muslims use words that we think are 'proprietary' for Muslims.
As for what may have first given rise to the issue of non-Muslims giving Salam, it used to be during the Prophet's time that those who hated the Muslims used to say 'As-saam ‘alaykum' (insted of As-Salam 'alaykum) which meant 'May death be upon you', and therefore there is a hadith that says to respond to it with 'Wa alaykum' (and upon you). However if a non-Muslim greets us with the correct greeting and with good intentions, the majority of scholars say that we do have to return the greeting. Even in the Quran, it says “When you are greeted with a greeting, greet in return with what is better than it, or (at least) return it equally.” [al-Nisa’ 4:86].
As in most difficult issues in religion, Malays have to learn to step back from the black and white of religious ideology and embrace the spirit of Islam.
Personally I don't think it is so much a Malay sense of insecurity. My Malay friends do not and have not worried about my use of any of those Arabic words, including Allah. But if you were to see who it is who makes an issue out of it you will see that almost always it is a politician or an NGO type wannabe who needs his or her 5 minutes of glory. Then soon you also get the PAS guys, not wanting to be left out of all that noise joining in the fray.
Bringing it up at Parliament or at the state level assemblies where UMNO rules or PAS rules is never a problem as who is to object anyway. And they leave a legacy having introduced the law or voted for it.
This is why I only have scorn for all these laws. Not that they were perpetuated to protect the religion. Islam has beeen through worse intimidations and onsloughts and it has survived all that. I don't think Islam needs a motely crew of jihadis wannabes from the Malay Ummah to have to come out to protect it because only they are able to see this sinister plot by enemies of the religion!!
Or maybe the Malay Muslims of Malaysia realise that they have not contributed anything to the jihadist folklore of Islam...so now that they have got a law that stops unbelievers from saying or using the "Allah" word, maybe they have a sense of achievement of a jihadist nature. Remember, this is a very Malaysian thing. Not even Indonesian!!!
Azleena ,
Thank you.
Why should there be so much Islamic "hiccups" in this country ?
I always believe Religion and The State should never have mixed.
Obama has better pronounciation of those Arab or Malay word cause he lived in Indonesia before. Just like I speak Malays like a Malays because I studied in Sekolah Kebangsaan & SBP with 99% Malay student population.
Sigh, Assalamulaikum & other myths are passed on in the Malaysian Muslim communities through word of mouth.
As they said, if you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth. So, if you repeat a myth often enough, it becomes a fact....
Another factoid: the first overseas military operation America conducted was on Arab nations. This book:
Power, Faith, and Fantasy: America in the Middle East: 1776 to the Present by Michael B. Oren
explores a fascinating relationship that makes Jefferson owning a copy of the Quran (which many luminaries of the enlightenment period did as well, despite knowing them as Mohammedans) not that unusual after all.
cheers
Post a Comment