Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Aha! Hilary Finally Acknowledges it!



Now this is what you call full disclosure, transparency, coming clean...yup, you reap what you sow indeed!

Friday, May 22, 2009

Caught in the Middle: Sri Lankan Tamils tell their stories

This article is from the Sunday Leader, a Sri Lankan paper well known for reporting without fear or favour so much so that its late editor, Lasantha Wickrematunge, was shot dead a few months ago. Before he died, he wrote his famous editorial predicting his own death. This is the type of reporting I wish we could see in our own papers.


The Great Escapes

By Vidura

The people in the internment camps want to talk and be heard. Everyone of the over 190,000 men, women and children want to tell their stories. They are fed up with the grand narratives in which they have been used as vulnerable victims by the LTTE and its sympathisers, by the Sri Lankan Government and its embedded spin doctors (and a swindler?) and now increasingly by the UN, the NGOs and the humanitarian industry.

They have all along known that when the others use them in their stories as ‘an integral component of the Tamil people’s struggle for liberation,’ or as ‘our people caught in the clutches of terrorism needing to be rescued’ or since of late ‘as IDPs facing a humanitarian crisis’ they are condemned to be robbed of their rights as citizens and humans.

Listening to people in the internment camps does many things to you. It causes frustration and drives you into depression. Their questions make you feel naked and vulnerable. Most importantly they shatter the myths about the former and current ‘liberators.’

They have harrowing experiences to narrate about their time under the brutal clutches of a maniacal LTTE, about their government that was deliberately reckless in its offensive operations, about their exodus through difficult terrain and ‘screening’ processes and about their living conditions in internment camps.

Bitter and angry

Many of whom I spoke to were very bitter about and angry with the LTTE. They felt they had been lied to and had lost confidence in them. Everyone of them confirmed that the army had shelled indiscriminately causing heavy civilian casualties and that the air force had repeatedly aerial-bombed civilian locations. All of them were relieved to have escaped the conflict zone and from LTTE control and to be in the IDP camps.

This feeling was universal despite the primitive conditions and incarceration in barbed fire enclaves amounting to collective punishment. They were also clear that it is the relentless and indiscriminate shelling by the army and the human shield tactics by the LTTE that made them flee their homes.

Everyone I listened to had been displaced multiple times. One old lady, Nesamma, in her late 60s told me that she was forced to move nine times in the last three months – as the army’s shells kept falling and shootings took place in close quarters — before she escaped on April 20.

Another woman, Parameshwary, in her 30s said that they had to carry a child (whose parent had been killed) and move either by foot or by bicycle for days from place to place – at least five times – in two months. She said that they were shelled and bombed from the air almost every day for two months. She had spent most of her time in hastily set up bunkers.

A 13-year-old child, Lawrence, who I swear looked much younger than that, had lost both his parents in a shell attack and tagged along with his very old grandfather through at least five places before coming out of the conflict zone. There are over 190,000 such experiences of forcibly being moved, fleeing for life and suffering great loss of life, limbs and property on the way.

Voluntary movement

Most of the initial movements seem to have been voluntary – as the fighting arrived nearer, people moved interior to places they perceived as safe. There were some instances of LTTE cadres ‘guiding’ them to ‘safer’ locations. Though some people reluctantly moved there wasn’t an indication of systematic coercion. Many still had confidence in the LTTE to fight back and fearing worse things on the government controlled side, preferred to move en-masse to places they considered safe.

The LTTE, while drumming up propaganda about transforming the war into a ‘people’s struggle’ and the need to make sacrifices, during the initial months, was still maintaining a distance between the civilians and their cadres, arms and equipment.

But when the fighting intensified and the towns fell one after the other, and particularly after Killinochchi was captured, the people realised it was a lost cause. They wanted to escape. Until then there weren’t many deaths due to shelling by the army and the LTTE did not apparently have to nor use much coercion to move civilians around.

There was some food available so in general people did not starve. But then the situation dramatically changed. Assessing the trajectory of the war many people wanted to leave. They began to fear for their lives. The only thing that prevented them was the fear of what the LTTE would do and the uncertainty about what awaited them on the ‘other’ side.

As the military shelling intensified, they wanted to escape to the government-controlled areas in order to save their lives. The LTTE began to violently prevent people from doing so. According to Parameshwary shooting of fleeing civilians or those with the intention to flee began when people started moving away from Viswamadu. Some others mentioned that it began at Iranaipaalai.

Strict orders

Around the time Killinochchi fell people were given strict orders by the LTTE as to where they should be moving. The violators were dealt with severely – initially shot and injured and later shot and killed. In the backdrop of intensive shelling by the army, the herding of civilians by the LTTE and the big plan to create a human shield had begun. So did the attempts by the people to escape.

One man, Lakshmidaran, who had escaped in early February said – ‘We wait in places to escape. Some times for days. The whole family, including the children, stay like this. Near the location where the fighting takes place. The army is shooting in this direction from about 250 meters away. The LTTE combatants are firing at the army from about 50 meters from us. We waited for the right time to break through the LTTE lines with white flags ready. We knew from Tamil radio broadcasts that we should not go across in the night. We waited till daybreak and crossed. The LTTE in the lines (front line) did not stop us at that time.’

But the escape became more difficult as the days progressed. The punishment for trying to flee was getting more severe. One middle-aged man, Shivakumar, said, ‘they (LTTE) started keeping sentries. These sentries and the intelligence department people were the most problematic. If you get caught you were put for ‘pani’ (meaning deployment in the frontlines to dig trenches at gun point). By this time, ‘the sentries and the fear of failure were the only two things that prevented us from attempting to escape,’ said Shivakumar.

Prominent leaders

There were many prominent leaders of the LTTE who were in the zone. But except on a few occasions they did not try to come and speak to the people. Ilamparithi on a couple of occasions was confronted by a hostile population. When things went out of control Pottu Amman had addressed a group of civilians.

The intense and indiscriminate barrage of shelling was what had initially compelled the people to decide to move out, but from about the middle of March (a few said it was from late February) the shortage of food became a primary reason too. What came from the government and agencies gradually was perhaps deliberately reduced. The LTTE was taking the food that the aid agencies brought and were allowing only partial distribution.

There were also instances of the LTTE selling food items that came as aid and using food as a tool to control people. Naturally the lack of food created agitations. There was an instance reported when the civilians overpowered a LTTE group and broke open a consignment meant for 600 LTTE cadres in the front line — fully recognising the brutal consequences.

‘In Maathalan, there would be a thousand who stand in a queue to get 500 grams of fish, seven pieces of dry chillies cost 100, but the worst thing is that even if you have money there was nowhere to buy anything. Children became very hungry and people began to take higher risks to escape,’ related Selvan who escaped in April.

Increased shooting

The shooting by the LTTE increased. When they shot and injured fleeing civilians, Maaran said, ‘they brought and dumped them in the hospital.’ ‘There were many innocent people particularly those who have family members in the LTTE who are too scared to come to this side, so they were planning to escape to India.’ But of course this became more dangerous after the navy tightened their cordon. ‘If their fears are allayed, they too will come,’ he said.

‘We stay near the water and wait for an opportunity to dash into the water. We stay in groups, mostly families together – old men, women and children. Some feeble people who cannot physically manage the ordeal will stay back. To leave behind family members is a difficult decision.

‘If we hit the waters, mostly in the dark, then the LTTE does not come to catch us as it would expose them to army fire from the other end of the lagoon. Instead they start shooting from their hiding places. When the army sees civilians getting into the water then they too start shooting towards the LTTE in order to rescue us. As firing happens across us we keep wading through the water.

‘Another dangerous obstacle was the craters created by artillery shells in the lagoon bed. You just slip in. Some drowned. The LTTE had also placed mines along the coast. I saw one of the women in our group hitting a mine and losing her leg. But we had no option but to keep going. While fleeing one of my cousin brothers, Kannan, and his two year old child were shot and injured.’ This was a narration of Ramanan who was lucky enough to escape from Maathalan.

Paid their way through

‘There were people who paid the LTTE sentries to allow them to go. Some got caught paying and were punished. Cadres from the LTTE intelligence wing and the ‘police’ kept a close watch on all of us. If families were conversing together they suspected that we were plotting to escape and would beat us up,’ said Maaran. ‘Any signs of us preparing to leave was detected and dealt with. The conscription by the LTTE became severe.

‘When we get to the water, then it is a long hard walk. After the initial shower of bullets from the LTTE side we see crossfire between the army and the LTTE. While wading through, holding our children including babies above water level, we see bodies floating in the lagoon – of people whom we know,’ added Ramanan.

When they reached the other side they were greeted by the army who had put up a barbed wire fence along the coast. They took the women, elderly and the injured and asked the rest of the men to stay in the water till daybreak.

Different groups of escapees had different narratives about their journey from the point of being rescued by the army till they reached the internment camps. For some it took just two days from the time they escaped till they came to Vavuniya whereas for some others it had taken a good two weeks from the date the army took them in till they reached the transit sites in Vavuniya.

A variety of ‘screening’ processes had been adopted according to those who underwent the ordeal. It included an initial body check and collection of information at the first point. The civilians fleeing were then addressed and instructed by the military. One said that they were given a speech in Tamil by a para-military. Later they were taken in for more questioning.

Long process

At this stage people were asked to identify if they had any dealings with the LTTE, be it as a combatant, spy, revenue collector, police or as part of the administration. They were lined up separately and questioned. Informers and cadres who had already turned themselves in were used to identify LTTE cadres from civilians. On most occasions except for some hardcore cadres and leaders the rest (even active combatants) were all put together and sent with other civilians to Omanthai. Many of those spoken to told that they were photographed either individually or as a family unit.

There have also been instances when some self-identified cadres or those alleged to be LTTE were kept back. As to how many of those crossed over from the LTTE controlled areas actually made it to the IDP camps we will not know for a long time until proper registrations are completed. As to how many were lost or disappeared on the way, perhaps we may never know.

What we hear from people are heart-rending stories, but we also occasionally hear of a compassionate LTTE cadre who shot in the air and let the civilians escape or the story about a brave soldier who jumped into the lagoon risking his life to save an injured woman.

Some of those who escaped also expressed a sense of dejection. They feel cheated by the LTTE. ‘Those in the movement said that they will protect us, that they will block the army’s progress and retaliate. They were telling stories,’ said Parameshwary. While the government is to be blamed for conducting a brutal military campaign with scant regard for civilians, the LTTE is to be blamed for the way they had used the civilians, causing great loss.

The people are so crushed and dispirited that it might have dried up their support for the LTTE or for a separate Eelam. Unless the government swamps them with their high-handedness, brutality and insensitivity when dealing with the displacement and resettlement situation these people are ready to try out alternatives. They have been and are ready to try out alternatives. They are willing to do that partly because of the LTTE’s brutal mis-adventure of an endgame.

(Names in this article have been changed for security reasons)

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Religious Leaders Weigh in on Facebook


Indra Harsaputra and Niniek Karmini , Associated Press | Thu, 05/21/2009 2:52 PM | National

Monday, May 18, 2009

AIDS Memorial Prayers...A Light in the Darkness

The first time the Red Ribbon has ever been put on a Surah Yassin! Special one printed by JAKIM for the International AIDS Memorial Day 2009.

Many years ago, in the mid-90s I attended a Forum Perdana, the religious discussion panel on TV, which became forever imprinted in my mind because it was so traumatic. The topic under discussion was HIV/AIDS and a mufti said that we should just let those who had been infected die while concentrating on prevention. He didn't know that there were several HIV-positive people in the audience who were there because, like me, they were attending a seminar on Islam and HIV/AIDS at a resort in Melaka organised by ABIM. Naturally we were all very upset by his statement.

I then asked him how do we show the loving and compassionate side of Islam, instead of this cruel and uncaring side that he was expressing? He then said that we are enjoined to visit those who are ill in hospital. BUT we should first ask what they were ill from!

Suffice to say that I have been put off Forum Perdanas since then.

Fast forward to last night at the Masjid Wilayah where JAKIM had organised jointly with the Malaysian AIDS Council a special International AIDS Memorial Day event. There were booths by several NGOs with information about HIV as well as several ongoing prevention programmes including the Needle and Syringe Exchange harm reduction programmes (NSEP). There were special prayers and yassin reading and tahlil with the Minister in PM's Department in attendance.

But to start off the proceedings was a Forum Perdana. On the panel was Dato Noh Gadut, former mufti of Johor, an ustazah and Bakhtiar Talhah, Executive Director of the Malaysian AIDS Council. I missed the first half but the second half of the discussion was very impressive. There was a real recognition of the stigma and discrimination that People Living with HIV have to face on a daily basis, with some encouraging words on how to face them. The former mufti declared that employers who discriminate against people with HIV should be dealt with in the law, because throwing people out of work based on their HIV status will lead to many other problems. It was really a far cry from the attitudes expressed in the Forum Perdana I saw many many years ago. (The mufti in the first Forum Perdana was not the same as the one in the Forum last night.)

What was even more impressive were the many non-Muslims who were also invited to attend the event. People like Dato Vaithilingam from the Hindu Sangam and Pax Tan from Malaysian CARE were seated right at the front with the Director-General of JAKIM. During the prayers, they waited in air-conditioned comfort in the VIP waiting room while watching the proceedings on closed-circuit TV. Afterwards they joined us all for dinner.

It was really an atmosphere of inclusiveness and solidarity. Truly the first time I have seen this in all the time that I have worked in HIV in this country. Hopefully there will be more of this.

Meantime I have to congratulate JAKIM and MAC on a job well done. It was a very memorable AIDS Memorial Day indeed.

Saturday, May 16, 2009

Remembering Those Who Have Left Us Because of AIDS

Tomorrow is International AIDS Memorial Day. It is a day for us to remember those we have lost to AIDS while re-affirming our resolve to keep fighting not just the virus but also the stigma and discrimination which have caused so many people to die.

There are many programmes being organised to commemorate the occasion. Today I attended a multifaith gathering at PT Foundation's premises in Jalan Tuanku Abdul Rahman. Members of the marginalised communities that are served by PTF such as sex workers, drug users, transexuals and MSM, came together to show solidarity with one another. The event was officiated by Deputy Minister for Women, Community and Family Development, Datin Paduka Chew Mei Fun and supported by the UN agencies in Malaysia. The highlight was prayers by each religion for the members of each religious community, held on different floors of the venue. I have to commend Ustaz Rohaily from JAWI who came to do the tahlil for the community.

On Sunday night, there will be another event at Masjid Wilayah at Jalan Duta organised by JAKIM. I think this is the first time ever that JAKIM has done something special to mark the day, which is fantastic. Again there will be special prayers and tahlil for those who have gone. We are expecting both the PM and DPM to attend. That would mean a lot to the many Malaysians living with HIV.

So if any of you are free Sunday, do come to Masjid Wilayah for maghrib prayers onwards. It would be a great show of solidarity with Malaysian Muslims living with HIV, who are the majority of the 80,000+ Malaysians who have been infected since 1986. Your support and your compassion will be much appreciated.

For more information on International AIDS Memorial Day events in Malaysia, and HIV in general, please see the Malaysian AIDS Council website here.

Friday, May 15, 2009

Come and Whistle!


Not at women, but for the safety of women!

In conjunction with the launch of the newest season of 3R-Respect, Relax and Respond (which is its 14th!), you are cordially invited to CapSquare this Sunday morning May 17th from 8.30am to 1 pm for 'Wisel untuk Wanita'. We'll have a whole bunch of things going on , including a walk for safety to highlight that safety is a right especially for young women, cheerleading squads, percussion bands and performances by all-women indie bands. Also performing will be rising indie singer Yuna.

And of course the 3R girls, Rafidah, Kartini and Celina will be there.

So, if you have nothing planned Sunday morning, come and join us at CapSquare! See you there!

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Reclaiming May 13

Tomorrow is May 13. Most of our people have no idea of the significance of this date because they were born way after 1969. Which may not be a bad thing.

Farish Noor has a take on it which is not about using May 13 to scare us all here.

And Anas Zubedy wants to reclaim May 13 as something positive and unifying. See what he says here.

A Confusion About the Greats

Published: Tuesday May 12, 2009 MYT 12:47:00 PM

Zambry compares himself to Mandela, Gandhi

By CLARA CHOOI


IPOH: Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abd Kadir, whose nearly three-month tenure as mentri besar was ruled illegitimate by the Kuala Lumpur High Court on Monday, has likened himself to Nelson Mandela and Mahatma Gandhi.

Warning Pakatan Rakyat not to under-estimate him, he said the High Court’s “shocking decision” did not mean he would give up the fight.

“To me, losing the mentri besar post will not reduce my fighting spirit in upholding the truth.

If reinstated Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin and his “friends ... assume that the High Court’s decision will dampen my spirit, then they have read me wrong,” he said in a blog entry early Tuesday morning.

He said a person did not need to hold a post in his struggle to uphold the truth, and likened the recent struggles faced by him and his “comrades from the Barisan Nasional” to those endured by politicians like Nelson Mandela and Mahatma Gandhi.

“Nelson Mandela sacrificed his freedom for 27 years in order to free South Africans from the grip of ‘apartheid.’

“Gandhi also sacrificed his life for the sake of India’s independence and so his people would be able to live without caste or religious boundaries,” he said.

Dr Zambry said however that it was lucky for him that his struggles had not caused him physical harm or loss of freedom.

“I only had to withstand the negative perceptions that Nizar and his people have created of me and the Barisan’s image.

“I know it will be hard to change such perceptions for their accusations are all over the Internet,” he said.

He also accused Pakatan Rakyat of being “greedy,” expressing disbelief at Pakatan’s “swift way of moving back into power,” especially the way they had reported to work at the state secretariat at 7:15am Tuesday, saying this was part of their “tyranny.”

Dr Zambry also reiterated that he accepted the High Court’s decision with an open heart and vowed that he would not question it.

“I will not be like the Pakatan which practises ‘selective justice’ by only accepting the decisions that favour themselves and rejecting those that do not,” he said.

Dr Zambry also maintained that the Federal Court’s decision that Speaker V. Sivakumar had no right to suspend him and his six executive councillors still held, although the High Court ruled that Nizar was the rightful mentri besar.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I know everyone's read this already and is falling about the floor laughing. But I thought the best comment was by someone who said that maybe Zambry is confusing himself with Winnie Mandela....

Anyway...silly, silly, silly Zambry! Those are very HUMBLE people you're comparing yourself to!! Tsk, tsk!

Saturday, May 9, 2009

Sex in the Dewan

Saturday May 9, 2009

Female reps accuse DAP and PKR of sexual harassment


IPOH: Several Barisan Nasional female assemblymen and their independent comrade Hee Yit Foong have claimed that they were manhandled by DAP and PKR assemblymen during Thursday’s assembly sitting.

The group claimed that the fracas that ensued left them fatigued with body aches and that the physical scuffle was tantamount to sexual harassment. (oh the poor ladies...)

Sungai Rapat assemblyman Datuk Hamidah Osman said that Barisan’s five female representatives, including herself, became victims of vicious attacks when they tried to protect Hee from being harassed by the Opposition.

There were definitely elements of sexual harassment because they came and grabbed us from the back,” she said yesterday, adding that she might lodge a police report. (Oh no, really? Luckily it wasn't from the front!)

Barisan side: (From left) Hamidah, Hee, Datuk Rusnah Kassim and Datuk Siti Salmah Mat Jusak explaining how they were manhandled during the Perak State Assembly sitting on Thursday.

They, however, stressed that PAS assemblymen had been very polite and well behaved throughout the sitting and even thanked them for staying out of the drama.

Hamidah said that it was clear the Barisan representatives were the victims because the ruckus only took place on the Barisan side of the hall.

“This shows that they had been the ones to attack us. Naturally, we had to respond in self-defence. None of our assemblymen had crossed over to their side,” she said.

Hee said that her former colleagues from DAP had not just hurled rude words at her but nearly slammed the hard-cover Standing Orders into her face.

“I have the book which contains the signature of the person who owns it,” she said, adding that she might lodge a police report.

Meanwhile, principal assistant to the State Secretary (management services division) Shamshuzaman Sulaiman said about 10 microphones were damaged and a large flowerpot smashed during the chaos.

A number of microphones on the tables had been pulled out during the melee.

He said the flower pot was shattered when policemen were dragging former Speaker V. Sivakumar out of the House. (They're more concerned about the flowerpot than a person???)

He said the State Secretariat would have to discuss with the Public Works Department on the repairs.

Hamidah told reporters yesterday that she saw Pasir Pinji assemblyman Thomas Su damaging the microphones.

“He broke at least three microphones. I saw him doing it right in front of me,” she claimed. (as she stamped her foot on the ground, hands on hips..)

Kampung Gajah assemblyman Dr Wan Norashikin Wan Noordin claimed that Su had even shoved her hands aside when she tried to protect the microphone. (oh my!!!)

“I was trying to allow the new Speaker (Datuk R. Ganesan) to address the House but Su pushed my hands away and broke the microphone.

“When we moved the Speaker to a different block, he (Su) did the same thing,” she said.

When contacted, Su said: “Well, there was a tussle and the situation was so chaotic. Who knows, they (Barisan assemblymen) could have been the ones who broke them.”

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

First of all, a definition of sexual harassment in the Malaysian Labour Laws:

4. SEXUAL HARRASSMENT

4.1 What Is Sexual Harassment?

  • Sexual harassment means any unwelcome verbal, non-verbal, visual, psychological or physical conduct of a sexual nature that might, on reasonable grounds, be perceived by the victim as placing a condition of a sexual nature on his or her employment because of his or her sex.
  • Sexual harassment may also consist of an unwelcome verbal, non-verbal, psychological or physical conduct of sexual nature that might, on reasonable grounds, be perceived by the victim as an insult or humiliation, or a threat to his or her well-being, and has no connection with his or her employment.
  • Sexual harassment in the office includes work related harassment which happens outside the office. Such work related harassment may includes situations taking place at work-related social gathering or functions, conferences, workshop or training sessions and during work assignments outside the office.
  • Sexual harassment in the course of work-related travel is also considered sexual harassment in the office. Where sexual harassment occurs as a result of employment responsibilities or relationship over the phone and through electronic media, it is also considered sexual harassment in the office.

So it is entirely offensive to me that these women are claiming that they were sexually harassed in the State Assembly when obviously it doesn't meet this definition. What's more, I wonder if they would support a Sexual Harassment Law if it ever came up, especially given that some of their male colleagues would probably pooh-pooh it.

Honestly, this is called trying to capitalise on something which wasn't there. Give me a break!

Friday, May 8, 2009

Time to Change Default Settings

Celebrity protestors looking to get arrested...

I wore mostly black yesterday. I must say that this week I had not been focussed on May 7 vis-a-vis the Perak State Assembly all that much. May 7 happened to be the first anniversary of the passing of my cousin Zahari Zain and for me, it was a black day anyway. But I hadn't been planning to wear black at all.

That changed when Wong Chin Huat got arrested for sedition. I don't know the guy and can't remember if I've ever read anything he's written. But I don't believe that anyone should be arrested just for organising people to wear black to protest something. I'm not that keen on demos and such but I like creative acts of civil disobedience. I think they are more subversive. Wearing black is not that creative but it works because it's easy and you keep people guessing whether your wearing black is of any significance or not. (I went to a meeting yesterday and my colleague wore even more black than me...inadvertently as it turned out.) I decided to wear black really to protest stupidity...on the part of politicians and the police.

(The ultimate stupidity, to me, was how they handled the people delivering that cake to the PM's Department. It's a cake, for God's sake! Read Walski's witty take on it.)

Then it just got worse. Following what was happening in Perak on Twitter, I was left disgusted and fed-up. Firstly, there is nothing commendable about the behaviour of any of the politicians inside the Perak State Assembly. Obviously bad behaviour is not limited to any particular political party. How on earth do we teach our kids to respect these institutions if they're populated by a whole bunch of clowns?

All the events of the past few days had me wondering about the default settings of the police. Many years ago I helped to organise a free outdoor concert by the Japanese musician Kitaro. Kitaro is no heavy metalhead, doesn't dance around the stage and doesn't really have the language skills to incite a Malaysian audience to rise up and rebel against anything. But those were the days when the FRU regularly turned up at concerts on the premise that young Malaysians get easily agitated by listening to music and will almost certainly riot.

It was intimidating to have a whole line up of big guys with red berets , truncheons and shields standing in front of the stage. And sure enough, as soon as the beat got the audience to do a bit more than toe-tap, down came those truncheons on several bobbing heads. It makes you want to riot just watching that; maybe that's really why they are called the riot squad.

The default setting of the FRU is 'nip it in the bud'. So if someone looks as if they might smell of 'trouble' ( as defined by some unknown person), down the truncheons come.

But that concert was circa 1985 or so. 24 years later, that default setting has obviously not changed.

Meanwhile the public's default setting has shifted from 'unable to understand all this' to 'okaylah, as long as they're not damaging property'. Which means that most of us are quite happy to tolerate peaceful protests, vigils and acts of civil disobedience as long as those of us who choose not to participate are not inconvenienced.

To say the cops are out of synch with the public is probably an understatement. How do you explain an IGP who actually thinks that telling people not to wear black is a sensible statement? The effect of that was probably that more people decided to wear black than before he said that. Maybe the next campaign is to get people to wear police khaki...

Arresting a political activist was bad enough, then they had to bring out machineguns (according to some tweets on Twitter) against some students showing support for their lecturer. It was all of 20 students; did they really need to come out so hard against them like that?

Then more people get arrested for holding vigils, for trying to give legal support to those arrested. Anyone would think that the whole country was in pandemonium that there needed to be so many arrests. Yet most people went about their lives like normal. But that police default setting kicked in; if we don't nip these in the bud, the whole country will collapse. Wow, that's really giving a lot of power to a few people.

I can't say that I know who or what is correct in Perak. Like a lot of laypeople, I'm confused with all these legal arguments. But I don't see the need to react to it in this way because I can't see how it helps clear up matters.

Perhaps that's because politicians also have their own default settings. And that is "If they win, I lose. If I win, they lose. Therefore I must always win, at any cost." It's called a zero-sum game.

Maybe somebody will win in these cases but we definitely know who loses, and that's voters. Everyone seems to have forgotten that the ultimate decision should rest with the voters. So the only thing to do is, ask them again. Who do they want? And that should settle it once and for all.

(And personally I hope none of these clowns get back in. But I'm not from Perak so it's not my call.)

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

JJ to DC???

JJ to be ambassador to US

KUALA LUMPUR, May 6 — A former minister is set to be appointed Malaysia’s ambassador to the United States, a move which indicates that the Najib administration is looking to upgrade its relations with the Obama administration.

The appointment, which is being vetted by the US State Department, could also raise questions about Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s appetite to keep controversial individuals away from his administration.

Jamaludin is best known for the Angkasawan programme. — Bernama pic

Government sources told The Malaysian Insider that Datuk Seri Jamaludin Jarjis will enjoy the status of a minister in his new appointment.

A close friend of the PM, he was passed over for a Cabinet position because of concerns that he was carrying too much baggage.

He was accused and cleared of sexual harassment as well as criticised for comments made about Malaysian Indians while on a trip to the United States a couple of years ago. But all along there has been speculation that the MP for Rompin and former Science, Technology and Innovation Minister would be rewarded with a senior position in a government-linked company or as a special envoy of the government.

The reason being put forward for his nomination to be ambassador is that he has a "good network" in the US.

A former Second Finance Minister and Minister of Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs, he is best known for the country’s Angkasawan programme, a project which brought pride to the country but also raised questions on the wisdom of spending millions of ringgit on a project with no tangible benefits to the public.

Several days ago, blogger Raja Petra Kamarudin alleged that Jamaludin tried to make a deal with him, asking the former to stop linking Najib and his wife to the murder of Mongolian model Altantuya Shariibuu.

RPK, as he is popularly known, alleged that he met Jamaludin at a car park at the Lake Gardens in Kuala Lumpur, and they drove to a roadside stall in Jalan Ipoh.

Raja Petra said that he did not make the deal. The blogger was charged with sedition for his posting “Let’s send Altantuya murderers to hell”, but he failed to turn up in court last month.

When contacted, Jamaludin said the allegation was rubbish, adding that he was seeking legal advice.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why, why, why???

The ambassador post to Washington is a very important post and we need someone there who truly understands international relations and diplomacy and all the issues that arise between us and the US. In the past we've had career diplomats (ok, one or two political appointees too but not for a long time now) including the late Tan Sri Zain Azraai. Our last ambassador there was Datuk Rajamah Hussain but only briefly I think because the post has been vacant for a quite a while.

But now we're getting a political appointee who will get Ministerial status as well. OK, that will tell the Americans that we regard Washington as an important post. But navigating DC is something else. Apparently JJ has many contacts in the US, including among the Obama circle. But getting past Rahm Emanuel may not be that easy.

Anyway, the US State Department still has to OK this appointment. What if they say no?

Monday, May 4, 2009

Public Holidays...and a Message

Folks, I missed wishing everyone a Happy Labour Day for May 1 but hope everyone had a good rest the long weekend. There's another public holiday coming up, Wesak Day on May 9 so some of us may get another long weekend and some not (those who normally work on Saturdays). I actually have to work on the Monday so it's really moot for me. :-(

My blogbro Anas Zubedy has made a point of publishing ads in newspapers on major public holidays and this Wesak Day is no exception. Read what he has to say here and tell us what you think.